[theme-reviewers] Theme Review Help

[carolina poena]

Is the more function required if the (index) is only showing excerpts?
 
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:54:19 -0400
From: chip at chipbennett.net
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme Review Help

Design aesthetic would usually dictate what method is used to handle long, non-breaking text. The critical concern is that long, non-breaking text doesn't *break* the layout.
"More" function does need to function properly.

Handling of a given menu size is also part of design aesthetic, though it is appropriate to require the developer to include any unusual limitations (such as "primary menu only supports 5 top-level menu items") in the Theme documentation (i.e. readme file) so that the end user is aware.

The number and severity of these issues is such that I would list them as *required*, but approve the ticket on the basis that they be addressed in the next Theme revision.


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Siobhan Bamber <siobhanbamber at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi everyone,


I'm going through the individual post unit tests for a theme I've been assigned and have a few questions. 


I've come across these issues in the individual posts unit test:


- Long non-breaking text is cut off. Should make use of the “word-wrap” CSS property in order to prevent this.


- “More” tag does not function in blog posts.
- Dropdown menus with a high depth of submenus can go off-screen. 


These are the only errors I could find. The theme seems to pass in terms of code quality etc. In your opinion, are the errors I found big enough to constitute a "Not-Approved" status? 


Many thanks.


Siobhan

_______________________________________________

theme-reviewers mailing list

theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org

http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers





_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130711/735c5efa/attachment-0001.html>