[theme-reviewers] Theme Review Help
siobhanbamber at gmail.com
Thu Jul 11 17:03:34 UTC 2013
Thanks very much for your help. :)
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
> Design aesthetic would usually dictate what method is used to handle long,
> non-breaking text. The critical concern is that long, non-breaking text
> doesn't *break* the layout.
> "More" function does need to function properly.
> Handling of a given menu size is also part of design aesthetic, though it
> is appropriate to require the developer to include any unusual limitations
> (such as "primary menu only supports 5 top-level menu items") in the Theme
> documentation (i.e. readme file) so that the end user is aware.
> The number and severity of these issues is such that I would list them as
> *required*, but approve the ticket on the basis that they be addressed in
> the next Theme revision.
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Siobhan Bamber <siobhanbamber at gmail.com>wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> I'm going through the individual post unit tests for a theme I've been
>> assigned and have a few questions.
>> I've come across these issues in the individual posts unit test:
>> - Long non-breaking text is cut off. Should make use of the “word-wrap”
>> CSS property in order to prevent this.
>> - “More” tag does not function in blog posts.
>> - Dropdown menus with a high depth of submenus can go off-screen.
>> These are the only errors I could find. The theme seems to pass in terms
>> of code quality etc. In your opinion, are the errors I found big enough to
>> constitute a "Not-Approved" status?
>> Many thanks.
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the theme-reviewers