[theme-reviewers] Something we need to check for3.4appearance->background

[Chip Bennett]

I think this is the incorrect behavior/assumption that core is now
attempting to force to change.

It does appear that such correction is going to cause some minor issues for
child Themes. Is this something that is a major PITA, or is it more akin to
ripping off a band-aid?

Chip

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net
> wrote:

>   Not currently, no.
>
> The expected behavior is reverting to the assignment by the theme.
>
> It has been this way since appearance –> background was introduced.
>
>  *From:* Michael Fields <michael at mfields.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 12, 2012 2:41 PM
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Something we need to check
> for3.4appearance->background
>
>
> The end user expects it to default to what the theme has.
>
>
> This is what the user expects to happen when they click "Restore Original
> Image". When they click "Remove Background Image" the background should be
> removed. just like the label says.
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120612/78c67a7d/attachment.htm>