[theme-reviewers] Something we need to check for 3.4 appearance -> background

[Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)]

This is not worth responding to until you can calm down and stop with the 
insults.



-----Original Message----- 
From: Otto
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 9:14 AM
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Something we need to check for 3.4 
appearance -> background

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)
<philip at frumph.net> wrote:
> Please re-read.

I read it the first time. If you think I'm misunderstanding it, then
please rewrite in a way that makes sense.

See, I don't actually understand what you're talking about in half of
your emails so far. I'm not quite getting your shorthand and what I'm
seeing seems to be short or truncated or something. It isn't
particularly clear, is my point, so if you want to be understood,
you're just going to have to be a lot more verbose about it.
Explanations. Details. That sort of thing.

Assuming you care about being understood, of course.

For example:

> ...custom-background arguments are flawed to begin with, it needs the 
> additional $args for repeat fixed xloc yloc and etc

That isn't a complete sentence. You claim that it's flawed and that
additional args are needed, such as repeat and so on, but you don't
explain what you mean by "flawed", nor why these additional arguments
are needed (hint: they're not as far as I can tell). Basically, you've
made a statement that is not only incorrect, but actually makes no
damn sense.

Can you elucidate, please? Or at least offer some clue of exactly WTF
you're talking about?

-Otto
_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers