[theme-reviewers] Something we need to check for 3.4 appearance -> background

Otto otto at ottodestruct.com
Tue Jun 12 16:14:28 UTC 2012

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)
<philip at frumph.net> wrote:
> Please re-read.

I read it the first time. If you think I'm misunderstanding it, then
please rewrite in a way that makes sense.

See, I don't actually understand what you're talking about in half of
your emails so far. I'm not quite getting your shorthand and what I'm
seeing seems to be short or truncated or something. It isn't
particularly clear, is my point, so if you want to be understood,
you're just going to have to be a lot more verbose about it.
Explanations. Details. That sort of thing.

Assuming you care about being understood, of course.

For example:

> ...custom-background arguments are flawed to begin with, it needs the additional $args for repeat fixed xloc yloc and etc

That isn't a complete sentence. You claim that it's flawed and that
additional args are needed, such as repeat and so on, but you don't
explain what you mean by "flawed", nor why these additional arguments
are needed (hint: they're not as far as I can tell). Basically, you've
made a statement that is not only incorrect, but actually makes no
damn sense.

Can you elucidate, please? Or at least offer some clue of exactly WTF
you're talking about?


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list