[theme-reviewers] Added addition codex information.

[Edward Caissie]

The process, in general, is a discussion ...

... and as this is not really a "new" guideline per se as much as it is an
extension of the existing AuthorURI and ThemeURI guidelines. This thread is
as good as any to have the discussion.
If anything a "draft" notice can be added to the "new" sentence currently
on the codex until this is sorted out but I agree with the necessity of its
inclusion, and do not see its relevance being assigned to a specific
version; if anything this idea is an over-sight from the beginning of the
Credit Link guidelines.


Cais.


On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Konstantin Obenland <konstantin at obenland.it
> wrote:

> Don't we have a process for adding guidelines?
> I sincerely don't know. I was under the impression additional guidelines
> would be discussed on make.wordpress.org/themes for every major release?
>
> Konstantin
>
> On 11.06.2012, at 03:24, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) wrote:
>
> > Theme Review Page, under Credit links.
> >
> > http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Credit_Links
> >
> > Added:
> >
> > Links in the description of the theme must be appropriately defined in
> respect to the AuthorURI requirements or to help and assistance to usage of
> the theme.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120611/c1ca2e24/attachment-0001.htm>