[theme-reviewers] Proposed WordPress 3.3 Theme Review Guidelines Revisions

[Mario Peshev]

I would not like 'must not' as too imperative - 'should not' or
'required to' + some other verb indicating negative sound better in my
language at least.

Best regards,

Mario Peshev
Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev
http://devrix.com
http://peshev.net/blog




On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
> We use the terminology from RFC 2119, in order to ensure consistency; so:
> "required", "recommended", or "optional".
> I suppose we could replace "required not" with "must not"?
> Chip
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Angelo Bertolli <angelo.bertolli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe the word FORBIDDEN could be used instead if it makes it clearer.
>>
>> On 11/10/2011 10:24 AM, Mario Peshev wrote:
>> > Please do apologize my English, but as a foreign language 'REQUIRED
>> > NOT to' written this way looks exactly like "NOT REQUIRED to'" (with
>> > this exact casing).
>> >
>> > Could be my bad, but these are guidelines and the cleaner, the better.
>> >
>> > Mario Peshev
>> > Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX
>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev
>> > http://devrix.com
>> > http://peshev.net/blog
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Good morning, Theme developers and reviewers!
>> >> Now is the time to begin discussing and finalizing the changes to the
>> >> Theme
>> >> Review Guidelines pursuant to the release of WordPress 3.3. Please read
>> >> and
>> >> discuss, here:
>> >>
>> >> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2011/11/10/wordpress-3-3-proposed-guidelines-revisions/
>> >> Note that, until WordPress 3.3 is released, these proposed revisions
>> >> are a
>> >> work-in-progress. Consider the above link as a "Request For Comment";
>> >> if you
>> >> have anything to add, or disagree with anything proposed, please
>> >> comment
>> >> accordingly. We post these, because we value your input and feedback as
>> >> Theme developers.
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> Chip
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>