[theme-reviewers] Proposed WordPress 3.3 Theme Review Guidelines Revisions

[Chip Bennett]

But that's the point: it *is* an imperative. That's the difference between
being REQUIRED to do/not to do something, versus something being
RECOMMENDED to do/not to do, or OPTIONAL.

For example: use of fopen() type functions: the requirement is imperative.
They MUST NOT be used.

Chip

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Mario Peshev <mario at peshev.net> wrote:

> I would not like 'must not' as too imperative - 'should not' or
> 'required to' + some other verb indicating negative sound better in my
> language at least.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mario Peshev
> Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev
> http://devrix.com
> http://peshev.net/blog
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> > We use the terminology from RFC 2119, in order to ensure consistency; so:
> > "required", "recommended", or "optional".
> > I suppose we could replace "required not" with "must not"?
> > Chip
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Angelo Bertolli <
> angelo.bertolli at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Maybe the word FORBIDDEN could be used instead if it makes it clearer.
> >>
> >> On 11/10/2011 10:24 AM, Mario Peshev wrote:
> >> > Please do apologize my English, but as a foreign language 'REQUIRED
> >> > NOT to' written this way looks exactly like "NOT REQUIRED to'" (with
> >> > this exact casing).
> >> >
> >> > Could be my bad, but these are guidelines and the cleaner, the better.
> >> >
> >> > Mario Peshev
> >> > Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX
> >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev
> >> > http://devrix.com
> >> > http://peshev.net/blog
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Good morning, Theme developers and reviewers!
> >> >> Now is the time to begin discussing and finalizing the changes to the
> >> >> Theme
> >> >> Review Guidelines pursuant to the release of WordPress 3.3. Please
> read
> >> >> and
> >> >> discuss, here:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2011/11/10/wordpress-3-3-proposed-guidelines-revisions/
> >> >> Note that, until WordPress 3.3 is released, these proposed revisions
> >> >> are a
> >> >> work-in-progress. Consider the above link as a "Request For Comment";
> >> >> if you
> >> >> have anything to add, or disagree with anything proposed, please
> >> >> comment
> >> >> accordingly. We post these, because we value your input and feedback
> as
> >> >> Theme developers.
> >> >> Thanks!
> >> >> Chip
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111110/af797bff/attachment-0001.htm>