[theme-reviewers] Proposed WordPress 3.3 Theme Review Guidelines Revisions

[Chip Bennett]

We use the terminology from RFC
2119<http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=rfc%20required%20recommended%20optional&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Frfc%2Frfc2119.txt&ei=he27TuXGFeXo2gXgh_2cBw&usg=AFQjCNFOxXVqXaO3EKLRE2wUoMIxuM4HVg>,
in order to ensure consistency; so: "required", "recommended", or
"optional".

I suppose we could replace "required not" with "must not"?

Chip

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Angelo Bertolli
<angelo.bertolli at gmail.com>wrote:

> Maybe the word FORBIDDEN could be used instead if it makes it clearer.
>
> On 11/10/2011 10:24 AM, Mario Peshev wrote:
> > Please do apologize my English, but as a foreign language 'REQUIRED
> > NOT to' written this way looks exactly like "NOT REQUIRED to'" (with
> > this exact casing).
> >
> > Could be my bad, but these are guidelines and the cleaner, the better.
> >
> > Mario Peshev
> > Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev
> > http://devrix.com
> > http://peshev.net/blog
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> >> Good morning, Theme developers and reviewers!
> >> Now is the time to begin discussing and finalizing the changes to the
> Theme
> >> Review Guidelines pursuant to the release of WordPress 3.3. Please read
> and
> >> discuss, here:
> >>
> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2011/11/10/wordpress-3-3-proposed-guidelines-revisions/
> >> Note that, until WordPress 3.3 is released, these proposed revisions
> are a
> >> work-in-progress. Consider the above link as a "Request For Comment";
> if you
> >> have anything to add, or disagree with anything proposed, please comment
> >> accordingly. We post these, because we value your input and feedback as
> >> Theme developers.
> >> Thanks!
> >> Chip
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111110/4f670cd1/attachment-0001.htm>