[theme-reviewers] Proposed WordPress 3.3 Theme Review Guidelines Revisions

[Angelo Bertolli]

Maybe the word FORBIDDEN could be used instead if it makes it clearer.

On 11/10/2011 10:24 AM, Mario Peshev wrote:
> Please do apologize my English, but as a foreign language 'REQUIRED
> NOT to' written this way looks exactly like "NOT REQUIRED to'" (with
> this exact casing).
> 
> Could be my bad, but these are guidelines and the cleaner, the better.
> 
> Mario Peshev
> Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev
> http://devrix.com
> http://peshev.net/blog
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>> Good morning, Theme developers and reviewers!
>> Now is the time to begin discussing and finalizing the changes to the Theme
>> Review Guidelines pursuant to the release of WordPress 3.3. Please read and
>> discuss, here:
>> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2011/11/10/wordpress-3-3-proposed-guidelines-revisions/
>> Note that, until WordPress 3.3 is released, these proposed revisions are a
>> work-in-progress. Consider the above link as a "Request For Comment"; if you
>> have anything to add, or disagree with anything proposed, please comment
>> accordingly. We post these, because we value your input and feedback as
>> Theme developers.
>> Thanks!
>> Chip
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers