[theme-reviewers] Proposed WordPress 3.3 Theme Review Guidelines Revisions
angelo.bertolli at gmail.com
Thu Nov 10 15:26:52 UTC 2011
Maybe the word FORBIDDEN could be used instead if it makes it clearer.
On 11/10/2011 10:24 AM, Mario Peshev wrote:
> Please do apologize my English, but as a foreign language 'REQUIRED
> NOT to' written this way looks exactly like "NOT REQUIRED to'" (with
> this exact casing).
> Could be my bad, but these are guidelines and the cleaner, the better.
> Mario Peshev
> Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>> Good morning, Theme developers and reviewers!
>> Now is the time to begin discussing and finalizing the changes to the Theme
>> Review Guidelines pursuant to the release of WordPress 3.3. Please read and
>> discuss, here:
>> Note that, until WordPress 3.3 is released, these proposed revisions are a
>> work-in-progress. Consider the above link as a "Request For Comment"; if you
>> have anything to add, or disagree with anything proposed, please comment
>> accordingly. We post these, because we value your input and feedback as
>> Theme developers.
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
More information about the theme-reviewers