[theme-reviewers] Discussion on suspension of old themes in the extend/themes

Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) philip at frumph.net
Mon Aug 16 15:28:11 UTC 2010

After a lengthy discussion with Cais in the #wp-themes we've come to a conclusion that a 2 revision suspension would not be entirely justified and would harshly impact the themes available that still will work with the 3.0 series albiet even if using deprecated and non standard code.

We've thought about it and discussed the functionality of the wordpress themes and what they do and what revision base at this time would be best to spend anything of it and less then.   

Anything from december 2008 and before should be suspended for 'old and needs upgraded' themes, that is the release time when 2.7 came out, 2.7 was the the release that really gave themes something more then previous revisions that match more closely with with what 'works' in a theme.   It was in essence really 2.8, but 2.7 was the start of it.  So anything previous to the 2.7 release really can be considered old and needing updated.

Then on the 3.1 release, do the 2.8 as the base and so on.

The concern is the 'warning' to developers that when it will be happening and enough word out to them that it will be happening.  Giving ample time for developers who might want to 'rescue' old themes from the repository to revive them.

Which brings up two thoughts, information needed to change ownership of said themes and ample time for developers to revive them.   And information theme developers that it's going to be happening.

Me? I don't care, suspend em, if they want them back up, they resubmit them.

Cais wants mass emails done, however collectively finding the authors emails would be a chore, let alone the fact that WordPress practically *never* mass emails and I doubt that it will ever happen, ever.  So alternatives need to be addressed as the following:

So what's the minimal that should be done?

A stickied post on the theme developement forum and a codex entry, in the most relevant places.

What would be optimal?

A post by Matt or the developers blog that gets seen in the RSS feed list of all wordpress sites, with the minimal post in the forum and codex entry information.

The idea' is to not be 'harsh' about the suspension of said themes, hence to backtrack to the pre 2.7 release, which keeps WordPress in a good light, while still giving a couple weeks ample warning.

------ Side Note:
Information about how to 'take over' an old theme, i.e. reviving it should be noted as well and that all old themes should have their original authors contacted then original author of said theme needs to email the repository theme admin requesting the ownership change, pretty much how it's already being done.

Side effect of the removal/suspension would also be that when they resubmit they will be automatically added to the theme trac when resubmit, which is a goal that would benefit everyone.

Additonal note: While the GPL Compatibility issue arose with the suspensions previously and there were some very vocal people about suspending the themes at that time, it was still done regardless of those complaints.   It was justified and responsible of the theme repository admin to do it.  It is the same with this;  The theme repository has an underlying responsibility to the end user to keep the repository up to date and in a manageable state to the end user.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100816/337ef297/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list