[theme-reviewers] First review and I'm lost - font license

[Emil Uzelac]

For the license sake and to make it easier is it safe to say that we can
start recommending /fonts/ when including the fonts? I've been doing that
myself as well and it is good practice. Many already do /js/, /css/ anyway
:-)
On Oct 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Justin Tadlock" <justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:

> Just as a general rule for myself, whenever I bundle resources like fonts,
> I usually do them like the following (Genericons example):
>
>     /fonts
>         /genericons
>             /genericons-regular-webfont.**eot
>             /genericons-regular-webfont.**svg
>             /genericons-regular-webfont.**ttf
>             /genericons-regular-webfont.**woff
>             /license.txt
>
> It's so much easier to find the appropriate license that way.  Not to
> mention, other theme authors can do a direct copy-paste of that entire
> folder and have everything they need for their own theme.
>
> If everyone would follow that, it make life a lot easier.  Of course, I'm
> always fine with stating the font/resource license in the theme's
> readme.txt, but it'd be nice if we promoted using some sort of standard
> convention like the above.
> ______________________________**_________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.**wordpress.org<theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> http://lists.wordpress.org/**mailman/listinfo/theme-**reviewers<http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20131011/f733fc04/attachment.html>