[theme-reviewers] Questions on my first review
Daniel
danielx386 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 12 00:21:45 UTC 2013
Not to be rude about it, but I would like to quote Otto again:
But Google Analytics, not so much. Realistically, the only thing you
> need to do for GA is to put some code in the footer, and there's
> dozens of plugins to do that right. I can't think of any realistic
> integration for a theme that would make sense. GA doesn't display
> anything at all, it records visits, basically. Not relevant to the
> theme.
>
> The way I see it, anything that is in the theme should somehow relate
> to the *display* of the webpage. That's sort of the whole point of the
> theme. If the code doesn't affect the *look* of the page in some way,
> then it shouldn't be in the theme
>
Or he wrong?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
> @Sayontan what makes you say that?
>
> Google verification, GA, Social Icons are empty fields, turned off
> by default, why would this be not-approved?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Sayontan Sinha <sayontan at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Plugin territory is a not-approve condition.
>>
>>
>> So "Responsive" should get its Google verification, Google Analytics etc.
>> removed, then, when there is an update? See
>>
http://themes.svn.wordpress.org/responsive/1.9.3.1/includes/theme-options.php.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Plugin territory is a not-approve condition.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Harish <me at harishchouhan.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Chip,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are many themes in the repo that have Google Analytics
integration
>>>> that could be activated from Theme Options.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should a theme be rejected because it offers options for Google
>>>> Analytics and Sharing or social buttons?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Harish
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: theme-reviewers
>>>> [mailto:theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] On Behalf Of Chip
>>>> Bennett
>>>> Sent: Wed 12 June 13 04:13 AM
>>>> To: [theme-reviewers]
>>>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Questions on my first review
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Google Analytics and sharing buttons are Plugin territory.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Peter Kakoma <kakomap at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Abhik,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the feedback; point 1 has been duly resolved...another
>>>> implementation I picked from the framework author. We do agree on
point 1.
>>>>
>>>> Point 2 though, as far as I know, isn't grounds to reject a theme.
>>>> Plugin/non-plugin territory, to the best of my knowledge, has been
debated
>>>> ad nauseam and the jury is still out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Abhik Biswas <abhik at itsabhik.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Pete,
>>>>
>>>> If I were reviewing your theme, I'd have rejected it straight away due
>>>> to two major issues.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Images should be resized using 'add_image_size', no external resizer
>>>> is allowed.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Those social sharing buttons and Google Analytics integration. In my
>>>> opinion, they fall under plugin territory.
>>>>
>>>> But, it all depends on the reviewer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Peter Kakoma <kakomap at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Springer. I've added to the discussion
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:11 AM, J.J. Springer <jjgspringer at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Peter,
>>>> I have updated your ticket with some other things that I found while I
>>>> was reviewing the theme. I hope that they are helpful. Your ReadMe
does have
>>>> the proper credits, so thank you for that. :) I just wasn't sure what
>>>> licenses were allowed.
>>>>
>>>> Otto,
>>>> Thanks for the speedy response! No worries about closing the ticket.
I'm
>>>> new to the process so any help is appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Amy,
>>>> Thanks for the detailed answers. I just want to make sure that I do
>>>> everything right!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again everyone for the help! Can't wait for the next one!
>>>>
>>>> J.J.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Peter Kakoma <kakomap at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Otto,
>>>>
>>>> The theme in question is mine; only issue it turns out after re-reading
>>>> all the tips here is the base_64 encoding. I customized a very
popular and
>>>> very user-friendly framework -the Slightly Modified Options Framework.
Very
>>>> big themes use it.
>>>> That line, "100% safe - ignore theme check nag", which I know got you
>>>> :-) was added by the Framework author. I took his word for it...seeing
as
>>>> the framework is used everywhere. I figured several themes in the
repository
>>>> already use it. I'm very aware of the base64 encoding rule;
>>>>
>>>> I've removed the option altogether; the encoding was being used to
allow
>>>> users import/export/transfer their settings. Will find another way of
doing
>>>> it...and will make changes to the framework repository so hopefully,
the
>>>> author can clean that up.
>>>>
>>>> I've re-uploaded the theme:
>>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/12964.
>>>>
>>>> Springer, if you can, please take a look at it again. (Seeing as you've
>>>> already downloaded it and started the review :-) )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The credit link leads to my page: http:kakoma.ug, which I'm upgrading
>>>> right now. I can put something else if the current 'under
construction' page
>>>> is an issue
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and the 'read me', as Springer can attest, contains proper credits
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, J.J. Springer <jjgspringer at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > 2. If I get any error of any sort, I assume that means that the theme
>>>> > is
>>>> > automatically rejected. As soon as I run into an error, do I stop and
>>>> > mark
>>>> > it rejected or keep going and try to find as many errors as possible?
>>>> > Is
>>>> > there a point at which I should just stop and send it back?
>>>>
>>>> This is up to you. Additionally, I apologize for usurping your review
>>>> and failing the theme, but that kind of ticked me off a bit.
>>>>
>>>> If you wish to do a full review and give the theme author more tips
>>>> and things that he needs to check on, that's perfectly acceptable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > 3. The theme that I'm reviewing is a child theme of twentytwelve and
>>>> > therefore doesn't have the "required" theme template files (missing
>>>> > comments.php). Are child themes allowed? Is there some special way
>>>> > that I'm
>>>> > supposed to be reviewing them?
>>>>
>>>> Child themes won't pass theme check, obviously, because of missing
>>>> files and such. The review guidelines still stand though, and the
>>>> child+parent must pass, as a whole, sort of thing. The parent is
>>>> presumed to already have passed, since it's in the directory anyway.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > 4. The person that I'm reviewing used a lot framework stuff that's
MIT
>>>> > or
>>>> > WTFPL licensed. Is that ok?
>>>>
>>>> Both of those are GPL-Compat, so they're fine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Otto
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> www.urbanlegendkampala.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> www.urbanlegendkampala.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> www.urbanlegendkampala.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sayontan Sinha
>> http://mynethome.net | http://mynethome.net/blog
>> --
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130612/1029ac11/attachment.html>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list