[theme-reviewers] Review-Continuation Tickets, and Reviewing Previous Tickets

[Edward Caissie]

I do not see any reason why one of the WPTRT Admins could not "suspend" a
theme for cause, especially in cases where the theme is found to be using a
non-GPL-compatible item.
To the best of my knowledge we address these issues whenever they are
brought forward.

Edward Caissie
aka Cais.


On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Merci Javier <mercijavier at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Chip,
>
> I see where you're coming from. The same thing happened to me. I gave a
> 3-4 days grace period to theme author to replace a bundled non-GPL font. I
> would like to add that the next theme reviewer should post a note in
> previous trac ticket to inform the previous theme reviewer what's going on
> with the theme.
>
> I was also thinking that I was wrong in keeping the trac ticket open then.
> I should have closed the ticket as not-approved right away and reported the
> theme for removal from theme extend live until the theme was resubmitted
> with GPL-font. The Plugins Review Team are quite strict with the GPL
> requirement where they take down any plugin with non-GPL bundled elements
> within minutes/hours/a-day. What's the theme review team's stand on this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mercime
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
>> 1. Where in the current ticket, the reviewer says, "hey, I found these
>> one or two, really minor, but required issues; I'm approving the Theme, but
>> please fix them in the next revision"
>> 2. Where in the current ticket, the reviewer says, "hey, you missed this
>> required thing; please fix it and re-submit. I'll hold your ticket open so
>> you don't have to wait in line again"
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130107/26dc5578/attachment-0001.htm>