[theme-reviewers] Review-Continuation Tickets, and Reviewing Previous Tickets

[Merci Javier]

Chip,

I see where you're coming from. The same thing happened to me. I gave a 3-4
days grace period to theme author to replace a bundled non-GPL font. I
would like to add that the next theme reviewer should post a note in
previous trac ticket to inform the previous theme reviewer what's going on
with the theme.

I was also thinking that I was wrong in keeping the trac ticket open then.
I should have closed the ticket as not-approved right away and reported the
theme for removal from theme extend live until the theme was resubmitted
with GPL-font. The Plugins Review Team are quite strict with the GPL
requirement where they take down any plugin with non-GPL bundled elements
within minutes/hours/a-day. What's the theme review team's stand on this?

Thanks.

Mercime



On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> 1. Where in the current ticket, the reviewer says, "hey, I found these one
> or two, really minor, but required issues; I'm approving the Theme, but
> please fix them in the next revision"
> 2. Where in the current ticket, the reviewer says, "hey, you missed this
> required thing; please fix it and re-submit. I'll hold your ticket open so
> you don't have to wait in line again"
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130107/393e354b/attachment.htm>