[theme-reviewers] Tags and description.

Sat Aug 24 03:14:23 UTC 2013

;-)
On Aug 23, 2013 10:13 PM, "Josh Pollock" <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Luckily, the people from WP.com and the people from WP.org know each
> other:)
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>
>> They did this pretty good
>> On Aug 23, 2013 10:09 PM, "Josh Pollock" <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting. Been a long time since I searched for themes on
>>> WordPress.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>
>>>> wordpress.com under Themes
>>>> On Aug 23, 2013 10:06 PM, "Josh Pollock" <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @emil- What is that image from?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm just getting caught up after being on the road all day, plus a
>>>>> nice dinner with @justin, and really happy that this discussion has become
>>>>> quite productive. Wondering if between now and Tuesday afternoon we can put
>>>>> a preliminary list of tags into a pastebin or gist that we have a
>>>>> preliminary consensus on thinking they are a good idea and we could review
>>>>> them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, that would be good example for sure.
>>>>>> On Aug 23, 2013 6:15 PM, "Srikanth Koneru" <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any examples for industry tags? Like Real Estate etc?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think, the vast majority of the time, an "industry" tag is just
>>>>>>>> marketing nonsense. What is it about a Theme's design that makes it
>>>>>>>> particularly useful to one, specific industry versus another specific
>>>>>>>> industry? I can see the case for "Business" in general (because a design
>>>>>>>> that emphasizes a business site can logically be quite distinct from a
>>>>>>>> design that emphasizes blogging, or a portfolio, or a news/magazine, etc.),
>>>>>>>> but not specific industries.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Azizur Rahman <
>>>>>>>> prodevstudio at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think we need more then just "tags".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Take the following tags for example:
>>>>>>>>>  "Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine,
>>>>>>>>> Video, Accessibility."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Above tags are useful from a developer point of view but are
>>>>>>>>> they useful for end users? They are mixture of industry and theme features.
>>>>>>>>> They are two distinct taxonomies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am sure end user would benefit form having industry specific
>>>>>>>>> categories/tags or something that are aligned with some of the popular
>>>>>>>>> theme market places. We do not need to go wholesale with marketplaces but
>>>>>>>>> something in that direction.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just my two cents.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 23 August 2013, Ulrich Pogson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  @Chip I like where you are taking this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Emil What list?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 23 August 2013 21:10, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nice, thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Srikanth Koneru <
>>>>>>>>>> tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, so :
>>>>>>>>>> Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine,
>>>>>>>>>> Video, Accessibility.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> accessibility
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Srikanth Koneru <
>>>>>>>>>> tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He can add these i guess :
>>>>>>>>>> Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine, Video.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Ulrich, do you still keep the list?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Srikanth Koneru <
>>>>>>>>>> tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well, Business/Corporate is one tag that is needed badly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Justin Tadlock <
>>>>>>>>>> justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  I definitely agree, Chip.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to focus on a set of meaningful tags that described
>>>>>>>>>> "types" of themes though.  We've kind of taken a single tag,  e-commerce,
>>>>>>>>>> and ran with it (with some good ideas too).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's one of my favorite tags:
>>>>>>>>>> http://wordpress.org/themes/tags/photoblogging
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think a good first step would be for us to come up with
>>>>>>>>>> similar, useful tags for users that describe the types of themes they can
>>>>>>>>>> download.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2013 1:48 PM, Chip Bennett wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I definitely see benefit in a both/and approach, rather than
>>>>>>>>>> either/or, to "e-commerce" and "plugin-support-{plugin}" tags. And in all
>>>>>>>>>> honesty, getting a generic "e-commerce" tag approved is probably easier and
>>>>>>>>>> more feasible in the short-term.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  But I'd still like to see some standard way for Themes to
>>>>>>>>>> declare that support, since if the "e-commerce" tag is added, a reviewer is
>>>>>>>>>> going to have to verify the tag is appropriate. A simple add_theme_support(
>>>>>>>>>> 'plugin-name' ) call would meet that requirement very nicely.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Justin Tadlock <
>>>>>>>>>> justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm re-posting this because my last email went to moderation for
>>>>>>>>>> file size.  I'm not s
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Azizur Rahman
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>>> Do you need cost-effective web hosting solution and Domain name
>>>>>>>>> try http://prodevstudio.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Missed the last Friday Khutbah, try catchup a Khutbah on-line now
>>>>>>>>> at http://fridaykhutbah.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130823/aadc6776/attachment-0001.html>