[theme-reviewers] Tags and description.

Sat Aug 24 03:12:49 UTC 2013

Luckily, the people from WP.com and the people from WP.org know each other:)

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:

> They did this pretty good
> On Aug 23, 2013 10:09 PM, "Josh Pollock" <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Interesting. Been a long time since I searched for themes on
>> WordPress.com.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>
>>> wordpress.com under Themes
>>> On Aug 23, 2013 10:06 PM, "Josh Pollock" <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @emil- What is that image from?
>>>>
>>>> I'm just getting caught up after being on the road all day, plus a nice
>>>> dinner with @justin, and really happy that this discussion has become quite
>>>> productive. Wondering if between now and Tuesday afternoon we can put a
>>>> preliminary list of tags into a pastebin or gist that we have a preliminary
>>>> consensus on thinking they are a good idea and we could review them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that would be good example for sure.
>>>>> On Aug 23, 2013 6:15 PM, "Srikanth Koneru" <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Any examples for industry tags? Like Real Estate etc?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think, the vast majority of the time, an "industry" tag is just
>>>>>>> marketing nonsense. What is it about a Theme's design that makes it
>>>>>>> particularly useful to one, specific industry versus another specific
>>>>>>> industry? I can see the case for "Business" in general (because a design
>>>>>>> that emphasizes a business site can logically be quite distinct from a
>>>>>>> design that emphasizes blogging, or a portfolio, or a news/magazine, etc.),
>>>>>>> but not specific industries.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Azizur Rahman <
>>>>>>> prodevstudio at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think we need more then just "tags".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Take the following tags for example:
>>>>>>>>  "Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine,
>>>>>>>> Video, Accessibility."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Above tags are useful from a developer point of view but are
>>>>>>>> they useful for end users? They are mixture of industry and theme features.
>>>>>>>> They are two distinct taxonomies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am sure end user would benefit form having industry specific
>>>>>>>> categories/tags or something that are aligned with some of the popular
>>>>>>>> theme market places. We do not need to go wholesale with marketplaces but
>>>>>>>> something in that direction.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just my two cents.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, 23 August 2013, Ulrich Pogson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  @Chip I like where you are taking this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @Emil What list?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23 August 2013 21:10, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nice, thanks!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, so :
>>>>>>>>> Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine, Video,
>>>>>>>>> Accessibility.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> accessibility
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He can add these i guess :
>>>>>>>>> Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine, Video.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @Ulrich, do you still keep the list?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well, Business/Corporate is one tag that is needed badly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Justin Tadlock <
>>>>>>>>> justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  I definitely agree, Chip.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wanted to focus on a set of meaningful tags that described
>>>>>>>>> "types" of themes though.  We've kind of taken a single tag,  e-commerce,
>>>>>>>>> and ran with it (with some good ideas too).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's one of my favorite tags:
>>>>>>>>> http://wordpress.org/themes/tags/photoblogging
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think a good first step would be for us to come up with similar,
>>>>>>>>> useful tags for users that describe the types of themes they can download.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2013 1:48 PM, Chip Bennett wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I definitely see benefit in a both/and approach, rather than
>>>>>>>>> either/or, to "e-commerce" and "plugin-support-{plugin}" tags. And in all
>>>>>>>>> honesty, getting a generic "e-commerce" tag approved is probably easier and
>>>>>>>>> more feasible in the short-term.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  But I'd still like to see some standard way for Themes to
>>>>>>>>> declare that support, since if the "e-commerce" tag is added, a reviewer is
>>>>>>>>> going to have to verify the tag is appropriate. A simple add_theme_support(
>>>>>>>>> 'plugin-name' ) call would meet that requirement very nicely.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Justin Tadlock <
>>>>>>>>> justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm re-posting this because my last email went to moderation for
>>>>>>>>> file size.  I'm not s
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>>>>>> Azizur Rahman
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>> Do you need cost-effective web hosting solution and Domain name try
>>>>>>>> http://prodevstudio.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Missed the last Friday Khutbah, try catchup a Khutbah on-line now
>>>>>>>> at http://fridaykhutbah.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130824/1cd5f9c6/attachment.html>