[theme-reviewers] Tags and description.

Sat Aug 24 03:09:51 UTC 2013

They did this pretty good
On Aug 23, 2013 10:09 PM, "Josh Pollock" <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Interesting. Been a long time since I searched for themes on WordPress.com.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>
>> wordpress.com under Themes
>> On Aug 23, 2013 10:06 PM, "Josh Pollock" <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> @emil- What is that image from?
>>>
>>> I'm just getting caught up after being on the road all day, plus a nice
>>> dinner with @justin, and really happy that this discussion has become quite
>>> productive. Wondering if between now and Tuesday afternoon we can put a
>>> preliminary list of tags into a pastebin or gist that we have a preliminary
>>> consensus on thinking they are a good idea and we could review them.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, that would be good example for sure.
>>>> On Aug 23, 2013 6:15 PM, "Srikanth Koneru" <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Any examples for industry tags? Like Real Estate etc?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think, the vast majority of the time, an "industry" tag is just
>>>>>> marketing nonsense. What is it about a Theme's design that makes it
>>>>>> particularly useful to one, specific industry versus another specific
>>>>>> industry? I can see the case for "Business" in general (because a design
>>>>>> that emphasizes a business site can logically be quite distinct from a
>>>>>> design that emphasizes blogging, or a portfolio, or a news/magazine, etc.),
>>>>>> but not specific industries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Azizur Rahman <
>>>>>> prodevstudio at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think we need more then just "tags".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Take the following tags for example:
>>>>>>>  "Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine,
>>>>>>> Video, Accessibility."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Above tags are useful from a developer point of view but are
>>>>>>> they useful for end users? They are mixture of industry and theme features.
>>>>>>> They are two distinct taxonomies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am sure end user would benefit form having industry specific
>>>>>>> categories/tags or something that are aligned with some of the popular
>>>>>>> theme market places. We do not need to go wholesale with marketplaces but
>>>>>>> something in that direction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just my two cents.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, 23 August 2013, Ulrich Pogson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  @Chip I like where you are taking this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Emil What list?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23 August 2013 21:10, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nice, thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, so :
>>>>>>>> Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine, Video,
>>>>>>>> Accessibility.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> accessibility
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He can add these i guess :
>>>>>>>> Responsive, E-Commerce, Business, Portfolio, News/Magazine, Video.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Ulrich, do you still keep the list?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, Business/Corporate is one tag that is needed badly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Justin Tadlock <
>>>>>>>> justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  I definitely agree, Chip.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to focus on a set of meaningful tags that described
>>>>>>>> "types" of themes though.  We've kind of taken a single tag,  e-commerce,
>>>>>>>> and ran with it (with some good ideas too).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's one of my favorite tags:
>>>>>>>> http://wordpress.org/themes/tags/photoblogging
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think a good first step would be for us to come up with similar,
>>>>>>>> useful tags for users that describe the types of themes they can download.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2013 1:48 PM, Chip Bennett wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I definitely see benefit in a both/and approach, rather than
>>>>>>>> either/or, to "e-commerce" and "plugin-support-{plugin}" tags. And in all
>>>>>>>> honesty, getting a generic "e-commerce" tag approved is probably easier and
>>>>>>>> more feasible in the short-term.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  But I'd still like to see some standard way for Themes to declare
>>>>>>>> that support, since if the "e-commerce" tag is added, a reviewer is going
>>>>>>>> to have to verify the tag is appropriate. A simple add_theme_support(
>>>>>>>> 'plugin-name' ) call would meet that requirement very nicely.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Justin Tadlock <
>>>>>>>> justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm re-posting this because my last email went to moderation for
>>>>>>>> file size.  I'm not s
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Kind Regards,
>>>>>>> Azizur Rahman
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>> Do you need cost-effective web hosting solution and Domain name try
>>>>>>> http://prodevstudio.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Missed the last Friday Khutbah, try catchup a Khutbah on-line now at
>>>>>>> http://fridaykhutbah.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130823/2cc8dbb8/attachment-0001.html>