[theme-reviewers] Why the double standards and why Pagelines gets special treatment?

Otto otto at ottodestruct.com
Mon Mar 26 15:30:24 UTC 2012

I have already answered those questions. You can keep on asking them
repeatedly, but it won't change the answers.


On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Satish Gandham <satish.iitg at gmail.com> wrote:
> @Otto,
> could you please answer the following
> 1.Why the pagelines theme needs a top level menu, how is it important for
> the functioning of the theme?
> 2.Why are they allowed to insert their fav icon by default?
> 3.My theme was rejeted because the footer link title said "free wordpress
> themes", and yet you allow them to insert their logo in the footer and
> dilute the brand value the the users site.
> 4.They replace the worpdress logo with their logo (without user consent),
> and yet they get a place in the repository and in the featured list.
> 5.What is the reason behind not allowing hot linking of images in themes?
> And how the harm done by hot linking images is negated in pagelines theme?
> 5.Their terms clearly violates GPL terms, yet you do nothing about it, and
> when it comes to my theme you suspend it without enough time to comply. Even
> after i made the changes to my TOS and notified you, you dint add it back.
> Satish Gandham
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list