[theme-reviewers] Why the double standards and why Pagelines gets special treatment?
sparky.g at me.com
Mon Mar 26 15:34:10 UTC 2012
I'm too novice for this list - I tried unsubscribing from site but not working
Can someone help me? Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 26, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> I have already answered those questions. You can keep on asking them
> repeatedly, but it won't change the answers.
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Satish Gandham <satish.iitg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> could you please answer the following
>> 1.Why the pagelines theme needs a top level menu, how is it important for
>> the functioning of the theme?
>> 2.Why are they allowed to insert their fav icon by default?
>> 3.My theme was rejeted because the footer link title said "free wordpress
>> themes", and yet you allow them to insert their logo in the footer and
>> dilute the brand value the the users site.
>> 4.They replace the worpdress logo with their logo (without user consent),
>> and yet they get a place in the repository and in the featured list.
>> 5.What is the reason behind not allowing hot linking of images in themes?
>> And how the harm done by hot linking images is negated in pagelines theme?
>> 5.Their terms clearly violates GPL terms, yet you do nothing about it, and
>> when it comes to my theme you suspend it without enough time to comply. Even
>> after i made the changes to my TOS and notified you, you dint add it back.
>> Satish Gandham
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
More information about the theme-reviewers