[theme-reviewers] Something we need to check for 3.4 appearance -> background

[Chip Bennett]

Required: IF the Theme supports custom backgrounds. Currently, such support
itself is not required. Two logical paths:

1) Require support for custom backgrounds
2) Leave custom background support optional, but require no style.css body
background declarations IF implementing custom-background support.

Chip

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Michael Fields <michael at mfields.org> wrote:

>
> On Jun 12, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) wrote:
>
> Requiring that the theme not implement any background to the body class is
> not necessary.
>
>
> I believe that it is. If the theme defines a background image on the body
> then the user has no way of removing it via UI which I think is really
> important. IMHO the "Remove Background Image" button should actually remove
> the image from displaying. A user needs this control. This is easiest to
> see in a theme that uses a semi-transparent default background image as
> well a default color. They should have the ability to not use this
> background image at all.
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120612/e38b12cf/attachment.htm>