[theme-reviewers] @package WordPress in DocBlock

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Sat Oct 15 16:15:37 UTC 2011

Currently, I would consider this point to be RECOMMENDED, rather than

At some point down the line, I would love to incorporate more
documentation-related guidelines, just to move more Themes in the direction
of best practices and WordPress documentation/coding standards; but for now,
I just point out things like that, and recommend the developer follow the
WordPress documentation standard.


On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Kirk Wight <kwight at kwight.ca> wrote:

> Are we allowing "@package WordPress" references in theme DocBlocks?
> I found one list reference<http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/2010-November/003118.html> questioning
> the practice based on plugin guidelines, but available themes such as Duster
> and Coraline still have them. Should they be accepted?
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111015/c019a2e9/attachment.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list