[theme-reviewers] external style sheets

[Emil Uzelac]

That's understandable and agreed :) Same goes for CDN from jQuery directly
and/or Microsoft as well.

*----*
*Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein



On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ryan Frankel <ryan.frankel at gmail.com>wrote:

> All of the basic jQuery UI theme roller styles would should probably be
> included too as you can pull them off of Google's CDN.
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Emil Uzelac wrote:
>
> > That would be good, however in addition to
> http://www.google.com/webfonts we might want to add few other credible
> sources such as:
> >       • http://typekit.com
> >       • http://webfonts.fonts.com
> >       • http://www.fontslive.com
> > That's what I can think of from top of my head.
> >
> > Emil
> >
> > ----
> > Emil Uzelac | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
> emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
> > Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Edward Caissie <
> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Given Otto's two comments I am seriously thinking we should be, starting
> with 3.3, RECOMMENDING all Theme assets (CSS, images, code, etc.) be
> included with the Theme package/archive; then moving to REQUIRED with 3.4
> ... although the only real go-forward issue I see at the moment is the
> inclusion of Google-fonts (low-risk but still contravening this idea) this
> can be addressed as well (per Otto).
> >
> >
> > Cais.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > While we are on this subject, what about themes like mine where it
> > make reference to style.Php on someone's phpbb forum? That
> > configuration is controlled in wp-admin.
> >
> >
> > If it's optional or something the user has to specifically configure,
> then it's clearly okay. The user should be presumed to know what they are
> doing and the ramifications thereof. This may not be the case, but any
> other assumption leads to Cthulu-level madness.
> >
> > -Otto
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111115/237b33bd/attachment.htm>