[theme-reviewers] external style sheets
emil at themeid.com
Tue Nov 15 23:52:41 UTC 2011
That would be good, however in addition to
http://www.google.com/webfontswe might want to add few other credible
sources such as:
That's what I can think of from top of my head.
*Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:
> Given Otto's two comments I am seriously thinking we should be, starting
> with 3.3, RECOMMENDING all Theme assets (CSS, images, code, etc.) be
> included with the Theme package/archive; then moving to REQUIRED with 3.4
> ... although the only real go-forward issue I see at the moment is the
> inclusion of Google-fonts (low-risk but still contravening this idea) this
> can be addressed as well (per Otto).
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Fenn <danielx386 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>> While we are on this subject, what about themes like mine where it
>>> make reference to style.Php on someone's phpbb forum? That
>>> configuration is controlled in wp-admin.
>> If it's optional or something the user has to specifically configure,
>> then it's clearly okay. The user should be presumed to know what they are
>> doing and the ramifications thereof. This may not be the case, but any
>> other assumption leads to Cthulu-level madness.
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the theme-reviewers