[theme-reviewers] Join the team

[Curtis McHale]

That's what I said. As I read the license it's okay but I just wanted to
make sure as I don't get in to the license debate often and don't know for
sure.

Curtis McHale
PH: 604.751.3482
http://www.curtismchale.ca
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale



On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:

> Tillium looks OFL, see http://www.campivisivi.net/titillium/download.html
>
> *----*
> *Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
> emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Curtis McHale <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:
>
>> I have another question as I try to catch a few other things for my notes.
>> The theme uses cufon and a special font called Titillium. The license says
>> it's pending in the file and when I follow it back to the source it seems to
>> be licensed under the Open Font License. As I read it this is a compatible
>> license with the GPL but I'm certainly not as well versed in it as others.
>>
>> Is this license compatible and therefore acceptable on the repository?
>>
>> http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL
>>
>>
>> Curtis McHale
>> PH: 604.751.3482
>> http://www.curtismchale.ca
>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:24 PM, SFNdesign <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for confirming. I'll finish off my notes in a bit and update the
>>> ticket.
>>>
>>> Curtis McHale
>>> 604.751.3482
>>>
>>> On 2011-04-17, at 5:14 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> sorry @Cais, I sent at the same time :(
>>> *----*
>>> *Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
>>> <emil at themeid.com>emil at themeid.com | <http://themeid.com/>
>>> http://themeid.com
>>> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Edward Caissie <<edward.caissie at gmail.com>
>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Curtis -
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the wrong textdomain is generally considered a "not-approved"
>>>> resolution if for no other reason than it is really just a "find&replace"
>>>> function ...
>>>>
>>>> Also note the Author URI; it does not really portend to be one of the a
>>>> Theme designer as the minimal content on the site is pointing more towards
>>>> and eCommerce blog so it really is getting into the darker shades of gray
>>>> related to SEO spamming.
>>>>
>>>> The other items you noted are not too significant, but given the above
>>>> you can make a point of noting them in your review comments as the first one
>>>> is enough to resolve as "not-approved".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cais.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Curtis McHale <<curtis at curtismchale.ca>
>>>> curtis at curtismchale.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a few questions about my first theme review.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. The theme uses the text domain of Twenty Ten in a few spots. If I
>>>>> remember correctly from lurking on the list this is a reason for failure of
>>>>> the theme.
>>>>> 2. They use a widget for the menu and instruct the user to add the
>>>>> Pages widget. It seems to me that it's a much better option to use a
>>>>> WordPress menu which defaults to list pages. I don't believe this is an
>>>>> issue for a fail but probably a good suggestion as an update to the user.
>>>>> 3. The CSS fails on the background-color since it's value is set to
>>>>> 'none' when it should be set to 'transparent'. Would this typically be a
>>>>> reason for failure if all other CSS is okay?
>>>>> 4. There are a number of other 'recommended' items in Theme Check but
>>>>> these are not a reason to fail a theme correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> I could probably go further in to the theme but I wanted to double
>>>>> check on the text domain item before I did.
>>>>>
>>>>> Curtis McHale
>>>>> PH: 604.751.3482
>>>>> <http://www.curtismchale.ca>http://www.curtismchale.ca
>>>>> Linkedin: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale>
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>>>>> Twitter: <http://twitter.com/curtismchale>twitter.com/curtismchale
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Edward Caissie <<edward.caissie at gmail.com>
>>>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here ya go: <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3320>
>>>>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3320
>>>>>> This will get you started ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cais.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Curtis McHale <<curtis at curtismchale.ca>
>>>>>> curtis at curtismchale.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Figured I'd finally get off my butt and join the team after looking
>>>>>>> at the list for a few months. My trac name is curtismchale
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Curtis McHale
>>>>>>> PH: 604.751.3482
>>>>>>> <http://www.curtismchale.ca>http://www.curtismchale.ca
>>>>>>> Linkedin: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale>
>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>>>>>>> Twitter: <http://twitter.com/curtismchale>twitter.com/curtismchale
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110417/3a565379/attachment.htm>