[theme-reviewers] Join the team

Mon Apr 18 00:54:47 UTC 2011

@Curtis - This is a good reference for compatible licenses:

http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Licensing

The OFL list listed there as being compatible.

Cais.

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Curtis McHale <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:

> That's what I said. As I read the license it's okay but I just wanted to
> make sure as I don't get in to the license debate often and don't know for
> sure.
>
>
> Curtis McHale
> PH: 604.751.3482
> http://www.curtismchale.ca
> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>
>> Tillium looks OFL, see http://www.campivisivi.net/titillium/download.html
>>
>> *----*
>> *Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
>> emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
>> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Curtis McHale <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:
>>
>>> I have another question as I try to catch a few other things for my
>>> notes. The theme uses cufon and a special font called Titillium. The license
>>> says it's pending in the file and when I follow it back to the source it
>>> seems to be licensed under the Open Font License. As I read it this is a
>>> compatible license with the GPL but I'm certainly not as well versed in it
>>> as others.
>>>
>>> Is this license compatible and therefore acceptable on the repository?
>>>
>>> http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL
>>>
>>>
>>> Curtis McHale
>>> PH: 604.751.3482
>>> http://www.curtismchale.ca
>>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>>> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:24 PM, SFNdesign <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for confirming. I'll finish off my notes in a bit and update the
>>>> ticket.
>>>>
>>>> Curtis McHale
>>>> 604.751.3482
>>>>
>>>> On 2011-04-17, at 5:14 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> sorry @Cais, I sent at the same time :(
>>>> *----*
>>>> *Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
>>>> <emil at themeid.com>emil at themeid.com | <http://themeid.com/>
>>>> http://themeid.com
>>>> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert
>>>> Einstein
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Edward Caissie <<edward.caissie at gmail.com>
>>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @Curtis -
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, the wrong textdomain is generally considered a "not-approved"
>>>>> resolution if for no other reason than it is really just a "find&replace"
>>>>> function ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Also note the Author URI; it does not really portend to be one of the a
>>>>> Theme designer as the minimal content on the site is pointing more towards
>>>>> and eCommerce blog so it really is getting into the darker shades of gray
>>>>> related to SEO spamming.
>>>>>
>>>>> The other items you noted are not too significant, but given the above
>>>>> you can make a point of noting them in your review comments as the first one
>>>>> is enough to resolve as "not-approved".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cais.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Curtis McHale <<curtis at curtismchale.ca>
>>>>> curtis at curtismchale.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a few questions about my first theme review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. The theme uses the text domain of Twenty Ten in a few spots. If I
>>>>>> remember correctly from lurking on the list this is a reason for failure of
>>>>>> the theme.
>>>>>> 2. They use a widget for the menu and instruct the user to add the
>>>>>> Pages widget. It seems to me that it's a much better option to use a
>>>>>> WordPress menu which defaults to list pages. I don't believe this is an
>>>>>> issue for a fail but probably a good suggestion as an update to the user.
>>>>>> 3. The CSS fails on the background-color since it's value is set to
>>>>>> 'none' when it should be set to 'transparent'. Would this typically be a
>>>>>> reason for failure if all other CSS is okay?
>>>>>> 4. There are a number of other 'recommended' items in Theme Check but
>>>>>> these are not a reason to fail a theme correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could probably go further in to the theme but I wanted to double
>>>>>> check on the text domain item before I did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Curtis McHale
>>>>>> PH: 604.751.3482
>>>>>> <http://www.curtismchale.ca>http://www.curtismchale.ca
>>>>>> Linkedin: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale>
>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>>>>>> Twitter: <http://twitter.com/curtismchale>twitter.com/curtismchale
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Edward Caissie <<edward.caissie at gmail.com>
>>>>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here ya go: <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3320>
>>>>>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3320
>>>>>>> This will get you started ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cais.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Curtis McHale <<curtis at curtismchale.ca>
>>>>>>> curtis at curtismchale.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Figured I'd finally get off my butt and join the team after looking
>>>>>>>> at the list for a few months. My trac name is curtismchale
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Curtis McHale
>>>>>>>> PH: 604.751.3482
>>>>>>>> <http://www.curtismchale.ca>http://www.curtismchale.ca
>>>>>>>> Linkedin: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale>
>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>>>>>>>> Twitter: <http://twitter.com/curtismchale>twitter.com/curtismchale
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>  <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>  <http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers>
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110417/810280a5/attachment.htm>