[theme-reviewers] What is wrong with you people? YourejectedTarski?

[Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)]

So you wouldn't reject it based on the comment_form() or the get_search_form() ?  alrightey.  And this is why i'm not doing theme reviews anymore.  You're letting crap coding pass.  Which then other people will then populate their themes with crap coding.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Andrew Nacin 
  To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org 
  Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 2:04 AM
  Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] What is wrong with you people? YourejectedTarski?


  On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net> wrote:
    Furthermore let's talk about ionfish how he has functions calling hooks instead of just embedding the hook in the location used .. erm.. why?  .. yeah I would call that unneeded unnecessary coding. 


  We're rejecting quality, extremely well coded themes on narrow technical grounds. It's not even a new theme. It's a minor update to a long-time existing one that is terrifically coded and wildly popular; it's a step in the right direction. This kind of rejection goes against the primary goals of the theme reviews. I see no reason why this theme update should not be approved. Not on the basis of it being rejected initially, not on a cursory review of the codebase, and not on this email, either.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  theme-reviewers mailing list
  theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
  http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100924/e87ecbbe/attachment.htm>