<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18928">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>So you wouldn't reject it based on the
comment_form() or the get_search_form() ? alrightey. And this is why
i'm not doing theme reviews anymore. You're letting crap coding
pass. Which then other people will then populate their themes with crap
coding.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=wp@andrewnacin.com href="mailto:wp@andrewnacin.com">Andrew Nacin</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org
href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 24, 2010 2:04
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [theme-reviewers] What is
wrong with you people? YourejectedTarski?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <SPAN
dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:philip@frumph.net"
target=_blank>philip@frumph.net</A>></SPAN> wrote:
<DIV class=gmail_quote>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex"
class=gmail_quote>Furthermore let's talk about ionfish how he has functions
calling hooks instead of just embedding the hook in the location used ..
erm.. why? .. yeah I would call that unneeded unnecessary
coding. </BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>We're rejecting quality, extremely well coded themes on narrow technical
grounds. It's not even a new theme. It's a minor update to a long-time
existing one that is terrifically coded and wildly popular; it's a step in the
right direction. This kind of rejection goes against the primary goals of
the theme reviews. I see no reason why this theme update should not be
approved. Not on the basis of it being rejected initially, not on a cursory
review of the codebase, and not on this email, either.</DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>theme-reviewers
mailing
list<BR>theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org<BR>http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>