[theme-reviewers] Discussion

Otto otto at ottodestruct.com
Wed Sep 1 15:30:25 UTC 2010

I should be ANYBODY's place to reopen the ticket and to bring in
discussion. There's supposed to be a dialog between the theme-author
and the reviewer, in order to come to a mutally beneficial agreement.

Closing the ticket is closing discussion and rejecting the author
completely. And I find that unacceptable. If you're doing this kind of
thing to me, then you're probably doing it to others too. And we need
to talk about that so that you'll stop doing it.

Why did you not want to have a discussion with the theme author? Why
did you reject the theme authors point of view, without consideration,
without bringing it up to anybody else, without doing anything but
saying "no go away" in essence?

This is not what I think a "review" is supposed to be. And we need to
talk about that.


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)
<philip at frumph.net> wrote:
> Otto, you didnt have a valid discussion, you threw your weight into a
> situation, it is not your place to reopen the ticket, to have been valid you
> should have stated your claim, it would be remarked and reopened by the
> theme-admin, i.e. cais.  THEN your obligatory asshole nature procluded once
> again that things were flawed and you would see the process removed, didn't
> you learn from last time?

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list