[theme-reviewers] Questions for Otto/Nacin

[Edward Caissie]

Although I would like to know more behind these ideas Chip ... I do like the
idea of the "suggest-not-approved" resolution, it could even replace the
"needs-additional-review" resolution.

BUT, each resolution needs to be clearly defined, or at least defined well
enough so it is easily understood when to use; and, what is required when
using each.


Cais

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> Otto/Nacin,
>
> Is it possible to restrict Trac ticket resolution options by user group?
> For example, can Group A be restricted to Resolution 1 and Resolution 2,
> while Group B is restricted to Resolution C and Resolution D?
>
> If so, would it be possible to implement the following for Theme-Trac?
>
> New User Group: Review Trainee
>
> Ticket Resolution Permissions:
>
>  - approved (Reviewer, Review Admin)
>  - not-approved (Reviewer, Review Admin)
>  - suggest-approval (Review Trainee)
>  - suggest-not-approved (Reviewer Trainee)
>  - DELETE needs-additional-review
>
> Alternately (a decision for Cais/Pross, I think):
>
>  - approved (Reviewer, Review Admin)
>  - not-approved (Reviewer, Review Admin)
>  - needs-additional-review (Review Trainee)
>  - DELETE suggest-approval
>
> Thoughts? Is this possible?
>
> Chip
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101008/1a822225/attachment.htm>