[theme-reviewers] Guidelines regarding Theme Names

[Trevor Turk]

I believe comments.php is required in the context of getting a theme
into the directory. If your theme doesn't have comments it wouldn't be
a requirement (you could actually get by with index.php and style.css)
-- but you need comments and therefore comments.php to get into the
directory.

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)
<philip at frumph.net> wrote:
> that original simplist theme that came up in this theme reviewers thread +
> comment from otto & nacin
>
> just give it a try with the minimal theme and nacin's plugin, it comes up
>
> (and no, no other deprecated messages come up)
>
> - Phil
>
> The official word is that the 'default' functions that fallback in WP are
> never really updated and who knows if they're going to be in there anymore
> in the future.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Edward Caissie
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Guidelines regarding Theme Names
> So no comments.php file throws a deprecated message at you? That doesn't
> seem right ...
>
> What theme is this happening with? I'd like to see this myself ... and are
> there other tempalte files we will need to make requirements for similar
> reasons?
>
>
> Cais.
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)
> <philip at frumph.net> wrote:
>>
>> While your in there add comments.php to the minimal theme files
>> requirement, official deprecated message comes up without it.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Chip Bennett
>> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Guidelines regarding Theme Names
>> Right on. I threw that together really quickly (and tend to err more
>> toward a "formal" tone anyway.
>> Looks good! Some of those (especially the "version-specific,
>> markup-related terms" item. Could probably use more content there. What else
>> similar don't we want in Theme names?
>> Chip
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I didn't change the intent of the section, but I did go in and
>>> "lightened-up" the text a bit ... it's a little less "formal" but the
>>> meaning is the same.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cais.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> See here:
>>>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Theme_Name
>>>> Please advise, comment, correct, and/or add appropriate Theme
>>>> Name-related guidelines. I notice I'm running into several instances where I
>>>> have to comment on the Theme Name. Some objective guidelines in this area
>>>> will be helpful.
>>>> Chip
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
> ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>