[theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page

Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) philip at frumph.net
Sun Aug 22 21:30:09 UTC 2010

Changed wording to:

Theme must replace all deprecated functions including the following:

instead of just replace the following etc..  We're thinking about removing the wordpress release # and features that were released it from the codex page because it's really something that can be checked with the WP_DEBUG displays for deprecated and the features added are already on the codex.wordpress.org/Version_2.9 type pages.   We're talking about focusing solely on the the theme review process and can reference links to the other needed information that is already available on other codex pages.

- Phil
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chip Bennett 
  To: Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) 
  Cc: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org 
  Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:27 PM
  Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page

  One other change (reversion) I would recommend: leave the deprecated calls listed with the WordPress version release at which the calls were deprecated. I think the information is much more useful listed in such way.


  On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net> wrote:


    Revamped the Theme Review codex per our discussion we had earliar.   * Need to verify that I didn't miss any thing.


    Changed:  Version information shows what features were released with required implementation date.

    Changed: Hooks and Template tags to denote a bulk of what is must, should and other optionals instead of separating them by individual files so it would be in a checklist type appearing.

    * Still needs to be updated to fix all the <tt>'s adjusting them where appropriate and implement proper codex links.  I'm not the best with wikicode.

    - Phil

    theme-reviewers mailing list
    theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100822/09399803/attachment.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list