[theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Sun Aug 22 21:32:20 UTC 2010

I'd really like to be in on that discussion.

That by-version information is rather imperative for Theme developers who
are attempting to keep their Themes current with review standards with each
new WordPress release. It is secondary to the review process, which is why
it is in the *Resources* section.

Please do not remove it.

(And again: how to join in the Theme Admin group chat?)


On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net
> wrote:

>  Changed wording to:
> Theme must replace all deprecated functions including the following:
> instead of just replace the following etc..  We're thinking about removing
> the wordpress release # and features that were released it from the codex
> page because it's really something that can be checked with the WP_DEBUG
> displays for deprecated and the features added are already on the
> codex.wordpress.org/Version_2.9 type pages.   We're talking about focusing
> solely on the the theme review process and can reference links to the other
> needed information that is already available on other codex pages.
> - Phil
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> *To:* Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net>
> *Cc:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:27 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page
> One other change (reversion) I would recommend: leave the deprecated calls
> listed with the WordPress version release at which the calls were
> deprecated. I think the information is much more useful listed in such way.
> Chip
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <
> philip at frumph.net> wrote:
>>  Cais,
>> Revamped the Theme Review codex per our discussion we had earliar.   *
>> Need to verify that I didn't miss any thing.
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#WordPress_Hooks_and_Template_Tags
>> Changed:  Version information shows what features were released with
>> required implementation date.
>> Changed: Hooks and Template tags to denote a bulk of what is must, should
>> and other optionals instead of separating them by individual files so it
>> would be in a checklist type appearing.
>> * Still needs to be updated to fix all the <tt>'s adjusting them where
>> appropriate and implement proper codex links.  I'm not the best with
>> wikicode.
>> - Phil
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100822/aaa65968/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list