[theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page

[Chip Bennett]

One other change (reversion) I would recommend: leave the deprecated calls
listed with the WordPress version release at which the calls were
deprecated. I think the information is much more useful listed in such way.

Chip

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net
> wrote:

>  Cais,
>
> Revamped the Theme Review codex per our discussion we had earliar.   * Need
> to verify that I didn't miss any thing.
>
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#WordPress_Hooks_and_Template_Tags
>
> Changed:  Version information shows what features were released with
> required implementation date.
>
> Changed: Hooks and Template tags to denote a bulk of what is must, should
> and other optionals instead of separating them by individual files so it
> would be in a checklist type appearing.
>
> * Still needs to be updated to fix all the <tt>'s adjusting them where
> appropriate and implement proper codex links.  I'm not the best with
> wikicode.
>
> - Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100822/c329a2a7/attachment.htm>