[theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page

[Chip Bennett]

How does one access this group chat? I have Quassel fired up and ready to
go, if I only need an IRC channel reference...

Chip

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net
> wrote:

>  Sorry, we're in a group chat right now going over all the cleanup, not
> theme admin ;/ whoops
>
> @chip if you have ideas for 'just reviewing' child-themes, that'd be great;
> we can bring your idea's up with ours and hash it all when it comes up.
>
> - Phil
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net>
> *To:* Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> *Cc:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:20 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page
>
> Done done and done, organized, function references added, cleaned up.
> We're in the theme admin discussing the changes and stuff right now.
>
> - Phil
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> *To:* Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net>
> *Cc:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:10 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Codex: Theme Review page
>
> Looks great!
>
> My only comment regards the by-file listing for functions, tags, and hooks:
> I had it laid out that way to facilitate stepping through the Theme files
> during the review: functions.php, header.php, index.php, comments.php,
> sidebar.php, footer.php.
>
> If we could organize the list such that it sorts by
> required/recommended/optional, and still facilitates a single-pass Theme
> step-through, that would be awesome. I'll take a look (later).
>
> The next thing on my to-do list was to add Codex links, so I'll try to
> clean that up, also, when I get the chance.
>
> Chip
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <
> philip at frumph.net> wrote:
>
>>  Cais,
>>
>> Revamped the Theme Review codex per our discussion we had earliar.   *
>> Need to verify that I didn't miss any thing.
>>
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#WordPress_Hooks_and_Template_Tags
>>
>> Changed:  Version information shows what features were released with
>> required implementation date.
>>
>> Changed: Hooks and Template tags to denote a bulk of what is must, should
>> and other optionals instead of separating them by individual files so it
>> would be in a checklist type appearing.
>>
>> * Still needs to be updated to fix all the <tt>'s adjusting them where
>> appropriate and implement proper codex links.  I'm not the best with
>> wikicode.
>>
>> - Phil
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100822/8270a054/attachment.htm>