[wp-hackers] WP Plugin DB 1.0

[Nick Parker]

Or just have an active moderator who approves plugin submissions as they 
arrive. Whichever. I figure as long as it's easy for a new/prospective 
WP user to find, then it's all good.

Jamie Talbot wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> If I remember rightly, there have been some concerns raised (though not
> shared by me), that people wouldn't want an initially unmoderated system
> directly associated with WP.  The argument is that any problems caused
> by it would be implicitly associated with WP itself and could risk
> damaging its core reputation.
> 
> Of course, assuming that the system is coded and moderated well (and
> drDave, I have every faith it is :) ), this wouldn't be a problem but
> still I can at least see the reasons for these worries...
> 
> How about a prominent link on wordpress.org to wp-plugins.org or
> whatever, and an equally prominent message there explaining this as an
> unofficial enterprise.  This should keep everyone happy?
> 
> Just a thought,
> 
> Jamie.
> 
> Trevor Turk wrote:
> | I agree that having the plugins db on wordpress.org
> | would be the best... But that's just me.
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | hackers mailing list
> | hackers at wordpress.org
> | http://wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers_wordpress.org
> |
> |
> |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFBbUnurovxfShShFARArStAJ9zLtwS3MGLR+b2sr/7M2Eva2+WvgCglJpz
> j7laRiQwRJfukWBSUd7C4K0=
> =LpF1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hackers mailing list
> hackers at wordpress.org
> http://wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers_wordpress.org

-- 
Nick Parker: http://beoba.net
http://getfirefox.com - Because Internet Explorer gives you popups and 
viruses.