[theme-reviewers] use of constants in textdomain
edward.caissie at gmail.com
Fri Dec 16 20:35:18 UTC 2011
Although not technically correct to use a variable for the textdomain as
described by Mark; and as Justin noted this is a 3.3 requirement ... we may
also want to revisit this as a non-show-stopper issue.
If this is the only issue with the theme then I would expect the theme to,
for all intent and purpose, work correctly except for letter-perfect i18n
It seems if we truly want to start expediting the process to get themes
reviewed we need to revisit some of the guidelines and how they are being
interpreted ... for instance I would, given the condition there are no
significant issues otherwise, resolve this theme as approved and note the
correction should be made in the next (hopefully soon) release.
In this particular case, it would be a logical conclusion to use a variable
as the textdomain, I had come to the same idea myself prior to reading Mark
Jaquith's post on the subject.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Justin Tadlock
<justin at justintadlock.com>wrote:
> Technically, themes will be translated when using a constant or variable.
> Where it's problematic is with automated translation tools as mentioned by
> Mark's post.
> For the 3.3 proposed guidelines, we're requiring it (is it themes
> submitted 30 days after 3.3 is released?):
> On 12/16/2011 10:58 AM, Paul de Wouters wrote:
> Referring to this post by Mark Jaquith:
> is this cause for rejection?
> theme-reviewers mailing listtheme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.orghttp://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the theme-reviewers