[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #19653: Order by meta field forces ignore of null records
WordPress Trac
noreply at wordpress.org
Tue Jan 20 12:57:16 UTC 2015
#19653: Order by meta field forces ignore of null records
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: tomauger | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Query | Release
Severity: normal | Version:
Keywords: has-patch needs-unit-tests meta- | Resolution:
query needs-refresh | Focuses:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Old description:
> When doing a sort on posts with a meta value, the way the SQL is
> currently generated in meta.php creates a condition where records that DO
> NOT have the queried meta value are excluded from the results. This may
> or may not be the desired behaviour, but we don't give developers the
> choice without resorting to custom queries or manual rewrites of large
> swathes of the $clauses array.
>
> The issue: the way WP_Meta_Query->get_sql() creates the join on the meta
> key is by setting an inner join on wp_postmeta and then adding the key
> test to the where clause.
>
> I would suggest writing an outer (left) join on wp_postmeta, with the key
> condition in the join. This would also eliminate any potential future
> ambiguity if, for example, you are sorting on one meta key but filtering
> on another, since the key condition would be within the join clause, not
> the where clause:
>
> {{{
> LEFT JOIN wp_postmeta ON wp_posts.ID = wp_postmeta.post_id AND
> wp_postmeta.meta_key = 'my_custom_field_name'
> }}}
>
> Related to ticket 18158 [http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/18158] is
> the question of how we expose this to the developer in the query API.
>
> {{{
> 'meta_key' => self::get_meta_key( 'my_custom_field_name' ),
> 'orderby' => 'meta_value',
> 'exclude_empty_meta' => false
> }}}
>
> If this gets any traction I would be happy to submit a patch.
New description:
When doing a sort on posts with a meta value, the way the SQL is currently
generated in meta.php creates a condition where records that DO NOT have
the queried meta value are excluded from the results. This may or may not
be the desired behaviour, but we don't give developers the choice without
resorting to custom queries or manual rewrites of large swathes of the
$clauses array.
The issue: the way WP_Meta_Query->get_sql() creates the join on the meta
key is by setting an inner join on wp_postmeta and then adding the key
test to the where clause.
I would suggest writing an outer (left) join on wp_postmeta, with the key
condition in the join. This would also eliminate any potential future
ambiguity if, for example, you are sorting on one meta key but filtering
on another, since the key condition would be within the join clause, not
the where clause:
{{{
LEFT JOIN wp_postmeta ON wp_posts.ID = wp_postmeta.post_id AND
wp_postmeta.meta_key = 'my_custom_field_name'
}}}
Related to ticket #18158 is the question of how we expose this to the
developer in the query API.
{{{
'meta_key' => self::get_meta_key( 'my_custom_field_name' ),
'orderby' => 'meta_value',
'exclude_empty_meta' => false
}}}
If this gets any traction I would be happy to submit a patch.
--
Comment (by SergeyBiryukov):
> When doing a sort on posts with a meta value, the way the SQL is
currently generated in meta.php creates a condition where records that DO
NOT have the queried meta value are excluded from the results.
A workaround (based on a [http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/a/55791/52635
Stack Exchange answer]) that was helpful for me:
{{{
function sort_by_checkbox_value_19653( $query ) {
if ( is_admin() || ! $query->is_main_query() ) {
return;
}
$query->set( 'meta_key', 'my_custom_field_name' );
$query->set( 'orderby', array( 'meta_value' => 'DESC', 'ID' =>
'DESC' ) );
add_filter( 'get_meta_sql', 'filter_get_meta_sql_19653' );
}
add_action( 'pre_get_posts', 'sort_by_checkbox_value_19653' );
function filter_get_meta_sql_19653( $clauses ) {
remove_filter( 'get_meta_sql', 'filter_get_meta_sql_19653' );
// Change the inner join to a left join,
// and change the where so it is applied to the join, not the
results of the query.
$clauses['join'] = str_replace( 'INNER JOIN', 'LEFT JOIN',
$clauses['join'] ) . $clauses['where'];
$clauses['where'] = '';
return $clauses;
}
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/19653#comment:11>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list