[theme-reviewers] Layout Meta Box vs Plugin Territory
Emil Uzelac
emil at uzelac.me
Mon Oct 27 05:02:38 UTC 2014
I don't believe that we are :)
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:40 PM, myazalea <myazalea at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Well that in theory depends on how the release is written.
> I mean that the people in the photos might not have given permission for
> the image to be used commercially,"unlawfully", for porn etc, no matter
> what copyright the actual image has.
> And because of that we shouldn't allow photos with identifiable people at
> all.
>
>
> Skickat från min Samsung Mobil
>
>
> -------- Originalmeddelande --------
> Från: Emil Uzelac
> Datum:27-10-2014 04:40 (GMT+01:00)
> Till: "Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers."
> Rubrik: Re: [theme-reviewers] Layout Meta Box vs Plugin Territory
>
> Model release is not GPL-Compatible, sorry :)
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:29 PM, myazalea <myazalea at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> What about model releases? I see some themes with (identifiable) people
> in their screenshots and there would be issues if those images were
> included in the themes as headers etc.
>
>
>
> Skickat från min Samsung Mobil
>
>
> -------- Originalmeddelande --------
> Från: Srikanth Koneru
> Datum:27-10-2014 03:02 (GMT+01:00)
> Till: "Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers."
> Rubrik: Re: [theme-reviewers] Layout Meta Box vs Plugin Territory
>
> Specific link for verification, no blanket statement for third party
> resources.
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:02 AM, priyanshu mittal <
> priyanshu.mittal at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the answer Justin
>
> Few more questions do we ask developers to add links specific to an
> image, used in the screenshot and the images presented with the package. Or
> just stating all the theme taken from xyz.com is more than enough.
>
> Thanks
> Priyanshu
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Justin Tadlock <justin at justintadlock.com
> > wrote:
>
> Post meta that deals with the design/presentation is OK (e.g., layouts).
>
> Post meta for creating content is not OK (e.g., video URL).
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 1:14 PM, priyanshu mittal <
> priyanshu.mittal at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am reviewing a theme and need to confirm wither meta-box comes under
> plugin territory or not.
>
> In this theme the meta-box is helping user to select the page layout and
> sidebar specific to the page.
>
> In my opinion it must be considered under theme territory.
>
> Kindly confirm, the url of this theme is
> https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/21277
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20141027/4337f0f8/attachment.html>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list