[theme-reviewers] Theme Names

Thu Jun 26 19:14:49 UTC 2014

Fine by me :)

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> It's really Otto's opinion; I just happen to agree with it. :)
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think Chip's opinion/decision on make blog about using generic names at
>> your own risk is best way forward, If you want protection don't use generic
>> names.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>>
>>> Let's just not become this:
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=themeforest+html5
>>>
>>> The only way we won't have any conflicts is to "enforce" no similar
>>> names period.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Catch Themes <info at catchthemes.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The best will be, like @Emil said. First come first basis. For any new
>>>> themes they shouldn't not be allowed to chose the existing theme names.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If the end goal is to "avoid...conflicts", then a rule such as "no
>>>>> dictionary words" is the equivalent of using a nuclear warhead to swat a
>>>>> fly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Saying that non-English dictionary words would sound "made up" and
>>>>> would result in few conflicts is a rather Anglocentric view. :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We can't do anything about existing themes, we should try and avoid
>>>>>> these conflicts in future if we can.
>>>>>> I was thinking of only English dictionary, other language words will
>>>>>> sound made up and will result in few conflicts if any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But my point is that such a guideline is demonstrably implausible,
>>>>>>> because, if applied to the current set of hosted Themes, would result in
>>>>>>> almost every single one failing. Thus, the likelihood of *future* Themes
>>>>>>> failing the Guideline would be expected to be commensurate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also: what dictionary? Just English dictionaries? What about
>>>>>>> dictionaries of other languages? What about dead languages?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> not with retrospective effect ofcourse.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Chip Bennett <
>>>>>>>> chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...which would eliminate about 99% of the Themes in the directory?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> no dictionary words?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Chip Bennett <
>>>>>>>>>> chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Back to my previous question: what would you suggest as the
>>>>>>>>>>> objective, enforceable guideline for Theme names?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Catch Themes <
>>>>>>>>>>> info at catchthemes.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Many of theme shop use common names like Box, Responsive,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome and so on. So, this means we can play with theses name by adding
>>>>>>>>>>>> word before or after.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Otto, I agree with you that Box is common name and I am
>>>>>>>>>>>> just asking this question so that we are clear about the naming rules. This
>>>>>>>>>>>> will help me in further Theme Reviews as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you all for your reply. I hope we will have clear
>>>>>>>>>>>> guideline in this soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Catch Themes <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> info at catchthemes.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the matter of choices of theme name and manipulation. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel The Box is so much manipulating Catch Box name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you can definitively show that to be true, then you have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> point, however, I don't see what your evidence for this could possibly be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you're reacting based just on the similarity of the name,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I have to point out that "Box" is a pretty normal and commonplace
>>>>>>>>>>>>> English word, popular even in movies:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://youtu.be/0cmqwbZa6_w
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, other than the name being similar, how is it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "manipulating" anything? Is it using the same code? Is it a derivative of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the other Box theme? Is there *anything else in common at all* other than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the name and the fact that they're both, you know, themes?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The name may not be a good choice, but this is not really
>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of anything other than both parties lack of creativity in naming
>>>>>>>>>>>>> things.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Otto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140626/fbc586d5/attachment-0001.html>