[theme-reviewers] Payment Option for Theme Reviews

Thu Jul 31 22:15:13 UTC 2014

Issue #4 is not a filter run by the uploader script, but
information/education for theme developer hoping that they will make a
honest effort to make their theme directory ready.

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> There will be no money involved in WordPress Theme Reviews. FULLSTOP.
>
> Seriously: it's a non-starter. We're not going there, in any way
> whatsoever.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Amirmasoud Sheidayi <
> amirmasood33 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> i think ever this idea can extend.
>>
>> a reviewer must review two theme at the time, one for free, one for money
>>
>> in this way both author that want to submit and update his/her theme will
>> be happy and also free theme queue will be reviewed.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Michael Hebenstreit <michael at mhthemes.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chip,
>>>
>>> yep - please don’t get me wrong. I didn’t want to say that you’re not
>>> doing your job! And as I said in my first email, it’s fully understandable
>>> that the review queue has very little priority in most people’s life.
>>> Everyone usually has much more important things to do.
>>>
>>> I just meant that if this was a company, it would be quite ineffective.
>>> And that we might need to find a new „incentive“ to give more people a
>>> reason to contribute in this field. I think that would solve all problems.
>>> But if the decision from „above“ is that these kind of things are not
>>> allowed, then we can’t do anything about it, just wait for more nice people
>>> with time to do a review. :-)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>  Michael
>>>
>>> Am 31.07.2014 um 22:43 schrieb Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>:
>>>
>>> But the review queue *isn't* our job - not for the reviewers or for the
>>> admins. It doesn't put a roof over our families' heads or food on our
>>> table. And quite frankly, speaking for myself, I simply can't afford or
>>> justify putting in the 10-20 hours a week it was taking to keep things
>>> under better control.
>>>
>>> The review incentive program worked, and worked well. Unfortunately, it
>>> wasn't possible to keep it from becoming a pay-to-play situation, and it
>>> had to be discontinued. Thus far, nothing has been identified to take its
>>> place, and we have gotten zero direction from anyone regarding what we can
>>> do to replace the review incentive program.
>>>
>>> Despite its flaws, the review incentive program worked:
>>>
>>> <QueueTrends.png>
>>>
>>> The review queue disappeared (except for a peak around Christmas, as
>>> always happens). And the rule that reopened tickets didn't count drove down
>>> the number of tickets getting reopened. Most impressively, the queue time
>>> decreased even as the input (tickets opened) increased. Now, as you can
>>> see, the review queue was nowhere near as bad as it was before we
>>> implemented the incentive program, but it is clearly trending in the wrong
>>> direction.
>>>
>>> But in the end, this is a volunteer activity. Developers volunteer to
>>> submit free Themes. Reviewers volunteer their time for free to review and
>>> approve those Themes.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Michael Hebenstreit <
>>> michael at mhthemes.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As stated before, unfortunately not. But as stated before, it seems
>>>> volunteer work doesn’t work well anymore and it might be the time to think
>>>> about new solutions. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have a problem with
>>>> waiting a few weeks for theme approval and I fully respect the work of all
>>>> reviewers and admins. But when we are honest and rational, we have to admit
>>>> that this doesn’t work well. If this would be a company and the review
>>>> queue would be client issues, we wouldn’t do our job very well. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 31.07.2014 um 22:04 schrieb Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>:
>>>>
>>>> Have you helped with the queue yet?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Michael Hebenstreit <
>>>> michael at mhthemes.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That doesn’t help the review queue and also won’t mark themes as live.
>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 31.07.2014 um 21:58 schrieb Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>:
>>>>>
>>>>> And you can get paid for reviews too, just go to
>>>>> http://jobs.wordpress.net/ and problem solved ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Michael Hebenstreit <
>>>>>> michael at mhthemes.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At the moment it seems that a lot of unexperienced reviewers are
>>>>>>> being motivated on WordCamps around the world. They review a few themes
>>>>>>> during the contribution day and then it’s over (in most cases).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WordCamps aren't recruitment drives. Those sessions should be
>>>>>> entirely for the benefit of the people there, not for any other purpose.
>>>>>> Our goal at WordCamps, overall, is to educate and inform (and meet and
>>>>>> greet and BBQ and so on).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If showing somebody how the theme review works and having them do one
>>>>>> for hands on experience helps them in any way, then that was the point.
>>>>>> Whether the result is useful to us or not is irrelevant, we only care
>>>>>> whether or not it was useful for that person.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wordcamps are for the Wordcampers. If they decide to continue
>>>>>> reviewing, great. If not, that's okay too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Otto
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140801/22551d0c/attachment.html>