[theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 31

Fri Feb 7 03:36:56 UTC 2014

The only thing that I can think of is that all posts to the list is
moderated, but that would be bad IMO.
Regards,
Daniel Fenn

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Jay R <dcoderk at yahoo.com> wrote:
> yes great observation
>
> can admin filter all the mailing list and have us option to accept if we
> want to read it or not
> is that possible?
>
>
> On Friday, February 7, 2014 11:27 AM, Ramiro C. <feedbackweb.rc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Stop sending me automated crap or else i will unsubscribe from all your
> services. Thanks
> What part you dont understand of i dont like games Stop serving me the game
> on the page and the list. Really disappointing.
> I hope that on a few hours all credentials will be restablished, if not i
> will unsubscribe cause of bothering automated responses and stupid behaviour
> of wordpress.org
> Bye
>
>
>
> Enviado desde Samsung tablet
>
>
>
> -------- Mensaje original --------
> De: theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
> Fecha: 07/02/2014 0:07 (GMT-03:00)
> A: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Asunto: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 31
>
>
> I DONT LIKE GAMES PERIOD would you please give me back my old credentials of
> wordpress.org thanks and bye
>
>
>
>
> Enviado desde Samsung tablet
>
>
>
> -------- Mensaje original --------
> De: theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
> Fecha: 06/02/2014 16:18 (GMT-03:00)
> A: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Asunto: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 30
>
>
> Users would have to be aware of that fact to take advantage of it :) But I
> guess it's ok since it's not doing any harm.
>
> Ols
> @Mel If you change the text domain nothing will break. The text domain for
> themes is not defined in the po or mo files. It is defined in the i18n
> functions, functions.php and the header in styles.css.
>
> The only place it could break is if someone has a translation in the
> WordPress language directory. Support for it was included in WP 3.7.
>
> Ulrich
>
>
> On 6 February 2014 17:22, esmi at quirm dot net <esmi at quirm.net> wrote:
>
> on 06/02/2014 14:26 Chip Bennett said the following:
>
> If the textdomain is unique, but not a literal string-match for theme-slug
> - if that's the only issue preventing approval, I would not hold up
> approval just for that. It will be required eventually, but right now, is
> completely invisible to the end user.
>
>
> Question - possibly for discussion...
>
> I have themes hosted @ WPORG since before the theme review guidelines came
> in. One of those themes has the theme slug 'purple-pastels' but the
> textdomain has always been (& is still) 'purplepastels'.
>
> Now I'd happily change all textdomain occurrences the next time I update the
> theme (it would take less than a minute to do) but what about existing users
> who might be relying on the old textdomain? This theme has been around for a
> while and I know that there have been quite a few .pot translation files
> created over the years.
>
> So - what's the lesser of two evils here? Continue to knowingly breach the
> guidelines on this point or potentially break some user sites? I'd imagine
> that I'm not the only one who has this quandary.
>
> Mel
> --
> http://quirm.net
> http://blackwidows.co.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> The idea of being a part of a community is the reason I suggested an Open
> Discussion thread on Make/Themes: a place for the team to talk about
> anything of general/common interest. I agree that it's very important to
> foster the element of community.
>
> Part of the reason that I recommend using the Make/Themes site is that we
> are moving toward Make/Themes being the community hub for the Theme Review
> Team. It is much more open, accessible, and searchable than a mail list, and
> much easier to maintain discussions, to post tutorials, etc.
>
> Ultimately, I would like to have the mail-list reserved for Theme Review
> Team "business": things specifically related to conducting reviews -
> admin-related tasks such as ticket help/reassignment requests, and the like.
>
> Personally, I definitely intend to post more tutorials on Make/Themes. I
> just posted one last week, though it didn't generate much traffic.
>
> PS you and @tskk should have gotten email invites for Make/Themes. Watch for
> Emil's forthcoming announcement. :)
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm not a huge fan of the P2 but it is extremely useful. One of the reasons
> I can't wait until O2 becomes available.
>
> The main reason I feel we all have to at least post once is because we are
> part of a community. Be honest and answer: how many of you knew that Otto
> was heading the theme preview overhaul? I never would have known that Otto
> and several others wanted the theme previews to have a redesign. I know I
> brought it up sometime ago but only a few responded.
>
> aside/
> Chip, curious, since @tskk and were both nominated with the highest count
> for team reps will that mean that he and I will be able to post on the
> themes/blog as well or just updates?
> /aside
>
> If possible I would love to see some tutorials be posted on the make themes.
> Or a link to some new techniques. I know there is the codex but the codex
> isn't always updated either. In a way the blog does serve as hub on not only
> how to make themes but how to submit to the repo. As a theme reviewer I'm
> always wanting to learn new ways of using menus, widgets, shortcodes, and
> CSS tricks. One of the main reasons I wanted to become a reviewer.
>
> But those are just my two cents. :)
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
> But the idea is to encourage more people visit the Make site. :)
>
> Honestly, for all the reasons I don't like P2, it is incredibly useful for
> facilitating threaded discussions, and an open thread would probably be more
> open and useful for general, open comments/discussions than the mail-list.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think not many visit the make blog, Having the discussion on the mailing
> list will reach more eyes.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
> How about a weekly Open Discussion post on Make/Themes? Would something like
> that be beneficial?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> First of all congrats to the three winners of the program ( Rohit, Zulf, and
> Alex )
>
> Second of all amazing job Srikanth on the impressive amount of updates
> approved.
>
> Last, I know we don't all post on the make blog(s) but I would love it if we
> all made an attempt to at least post once a week. I've been trying to and
> you would be amazed as to how much goes on at once. The support forum team,
> core, UI, meta and others is a great way to learn more about what is going
> on not only in the WordPress community but the future of it as well.
>
> One thing I'm personally looking forward to is the Widget Customizer
> integration and the styling/documentation of Media within WordPress core.
>
> Another is on the meta trac which I know not many really know about. I
> seriously encourage you all to at least head over to meta.trac.wordpress.org
> and check out some of the tickets. In particular tickets: 27, 30, 45, and
> 215.
>
> So if you haven't already posted on the blog:
> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2014/02/05/theme-review-incentive-january-2014-winners-and-program-updates/
>
> Go ahead. And once there check out what the UI and core team are doing. :)
>
> -Jose
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> Please change your subscription to individual email. Digests are for reading
> only. Please don't reply to them.
>
> Also: I have no idea what you're talking about. The Theme Review Team has no
> control over your WPORG credentials.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Ramiro C. <feedbackweb.rc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I DONT LIKE GAMES PERIOD would you please give me back my old credentials of
> wordpress.org thanks and bye
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>