[theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 31

Fri Feb 7 03:31:00 UTC 2014

Ramiro,

We did not take your credentials and did not subscribe you to this list.

If you want to stop messages go to
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers and unsubscribe.

If you have issues with your WordPress.org account please see
http://wordpress.org/

Thanks,
Emil

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Ramiro C. <feedbackweb.rc at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Stop sending me automated crap or else i will unsubscribe from all your
> services. Thanks
> What part you dont understand of i dont like games Stop serving me the
> game on the page and the list. Really disappointing.
> I hope that on a few hours all credentials will be restablished, if not i
> will unsubscribe cause of bothering automated responses and stupid
> behaviour of wordpress.org
> Bye
>
>
>
> Enviado desde Samsung tablet
>
>
>
> -------- Mensaje original --------
> De: theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
> Fecha: 07/02/2014 0:07 (GMT-03:00)
> A: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Asunto: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 31
>
>
> I DONT LIKE GAMES PERIOD would you please give me back my old credentials
> of wordpress.org thanks and bye
>
>
>
>
> Enviado desde Samsung tablet
>
>
>
> -------- Mensaje original --------
> De: theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
> Fecha: 06/02/2014 16:18 (GMT-03:00)
> A: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Asunto: theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 45, Issue 30
>
>
> Users would have to be aware of that fact to take advantage of it :) But I
> guess it's ok since it's not doing any harm.
>
> Ols
> @Mel If you change the text domain nothing will break. The text domain for
> themes is not defined in the po or mo files. It is defined in the i18n
> functions, functions.php and the header in styles.css.
>
> The only place it could break is if someone has a translation in the
> WordPress language directory. Support for it was included in WP 3.7.
>
> Ulrich
>
>
> On 6 February 2014 17:22, esmi at quirm dot net <esmi at quirm.net> wrote:
>
>> on 06/02/2014 14:26 Chip Bennett said the following:
>>
>>  If the textdomain is unique, but not a literal string-match for
>>> theme-slug
>>> - if that's the only issue preventing approval, I would not hold up
>>> approval just for that. It will be required eventually, but right now, is
>>> completely invisible to the end user.
>>>
>>
>> Question - possibly for discussion...
>>
>> I have themes hosted @ WPORG since before the theme review guidelines
>> came in. One of those themes has the theme slug 'purple-pastels' but the
>> textdomain has always been (& is still) 'purplepastels'.
>>
>> Now I'd happily change all textdomain occurrences the next time I update
>> the theme (it would take less than a minute to do) but what about existing
>> users who might be relying on the old textdomain? This theme has been
>> around for a while and I know that there have been quite a few .pot
>> translation files created over the years.
>>
>> So - what's the lesser of two evils here? Continue to knowingly breach
>> the guidelines on this point or potentially break some user sites? I'd
>> imagine that I'm not the only one who has this quandary.
>>
>> Mel
>> --
>> http://quirm.net
>> http://blackwidows.co.uk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
> The idea of being a part of a community is the reason I suggested an Open
> Discussion thread on Make/Themes: a place for the team to talk about
> anything of general/common interest. I agree that it's very important to
> foster the element of community.
>
> Part of the reason that I recommend using the Make/Themes site is that we
> are moving toward Make/Themes being the community hub for the Theme Review
> Team. It is much more open, accessible, and searchable than a mail list,
> and much easier to maintain discussions, to post tutorials, etc.
>
> Ultimately, I would like to have the mail-list reserved for Theme Review
> Team "business": things specifically related to conducting reviews -
> admin-related tasks such as ticket help/reassignment requests, and the like.
>
> Personally, I definitely intend to post more tutorials on Make/Themes. I
> just posted one last week, though it didn't generate much traffic.
>
> PS you and @tskk should have gotten email invites for Make/Themes. Watch
> for Emil's forthcoming announcement. :)
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I'm not a huge fan of the P2 but it is extremely useful. One of the
>> reasons I can't wait until O2 becomes available.
>>
>> The main reason I feel we all have to at least post once is because we
>> are part of a community. Be honest and answer: how many of you knew that
>> Otto was heading the theme preview overhaul? I never would have known that
>> Otto and several others wanted the theme previews to have a redesign. I
>> know I brought it up sometime ago but only a few responded.
>>
>> aside/
>> Chip, curious, since @tskk and were both nominated with the highest count
>> for team reps will that mean that he and I will be able to post on the
>> themes/blog as well or just updates?
>> /aside
>>
>> If possible I would love to see some tutorials be posted on the make
>> themes. Or a link to some new techniques. I know there is the codex but the
>> codex isn't always updated either. In a way the blog does serve as hub on
>> not only how to make themes but how to submit to the repo. As a theme
>> reviewer I'm always wanting to learn new ways of using menus, widgets,
>> shortcodes, and CSS tricks. One of the main reasons I wanted to become a
>> reviewer.
>>
>> But those are just my two cents. :)
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>
>>> But the idea is to encourage more people visit the Make site. :)
>>>
>>> Honestly, for all the reasons I don't like P2, it is incredibly useful
>>> for facilitating threaded discussions, and an open thread would probably be
>>> more open and useful for general, open comments/discussions than the
>>> mail-list.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think not many visit the make blog, Having the discussion on the
>>>> mailing list will reach more eyes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> How about a weekly Open Discussion post on Make/Themes? Would
>>>>> something like that be beneficial?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Jose Castaneda <
>>>>> jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> First of all congrats to the three winners of the program ( Rohit,
>>>>>> Zulf, and Alex )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Second of all amazing job Srikanth on the impressive amount of
>>>>>> updates approved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Last, I know we don't all post on the make blog(s) but I would love
>>>>>> it if we all made an attempt to at least post once a week. I've been trying
>>>>>> to and you would be amazed as to how much goes on at once. The support
>>>>>> forum team, core, UI, meta and others is a great way to learn more about
>>>>>> what is going on not only in the WordPress community but the future of it
>>>>>> as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One thing I'm personally looking forward to is the Widget Customizer
>>>>>> integration and the styling/documentation of Media within WordPress core.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another is on the meta trac which I know not many really know about.
>>>>>> I seriously encourage you all to at least head over to
>>>>>> meta.trac.wordpress.org and check out some of the tickets. In
>>>>>> particular tickets: 27, 30, 45, and  215.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So if you haven't already posted on the blog:
>>>>>> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2014/02/05/theme-review-incentive-january-2014-winners-and-program-updates/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go ahead. And once there check out what the UI and core team are
>>>>>> doing. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Jose
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
> Please change your subscription to individual email. Digests are for
> reading only. Please don't reply to them.
>
> Also: I have no idea what you're talking about. The Theme Review Team has
> no control over your WPORG credentials.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Ramiro C. <feedbackweb.rc at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I DONT LIKE GAMES PERIOD would you please give me back my old credentials
>> of wordpress.org thanks and bye
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140206/ce9ff472/attachment-0001.html>