[theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting

[Emil Uzelac]

​Stop by at our house, we have few ;)​


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Philip Arthur Moore <philip at pressbuild.com>
wrote:

> If you find a completely neutral, unbiased, amazing theme reviewer
> good enough for WordPress.org who does not own a theme shop or make
> themes that would in any way "conflict" with WordPress.org, let me
> know. I've been looking for unicorns.
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I guess stepping stone in figurative pyramid comment gave me wrong idea.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Here's my take on (and original intent for proposing) the role of
> "trusted
> >> reviewer": they are reviewers who are experienced enough, and who
> perform
> >> thorough and complete enough reviews, to be *trusted* to push approved
> >> themes Live - either directly (in the case of their own tickets) or
> >> indirectly (in the case of the admin review queue.
> >>
> >> No more, no less. Not a "path to admin", not a title or recognition.
> Just
> >> those competent to push themes live.
> >>
> >> It's also not a status symbol or exclusive club. As far as I'm
> concerned,
> >> it should be something available to every single reviewer.
> >>
> >> The whole point is to facilitate the review process while ensuring that
> >> themes with critical issues don't end up in end users' hands.
> >>
> >> On Aug 28, 2014 5:38 PM, "Jose Castaneda" <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> As some of you are aware, and even attended, our meeting on tuesday
> went
> >>> good. If you would like to read the logs:
> >>>
> https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-themes&day=2014-08-26&sort=asc#m106404
> >>>
> >>> The basis of the meeting was to define the role of a key/trusted
> >>> reviewer. That person will have the ability to push themes live but
> not the
> >>> ability to assign tickets, sort of a sub-admin type of role. As Cais
> >>> mentioned the key things the admins are looking for are:
> >>>
> >>> * experience
> >>> * community involvement
> >>> * high quality reviews
> >>>
> >>> He also notes that he, and the other admins, would love more feedback.
> >>> Seriously, I cannot emphasize that part enough, folks. The more
> feedback we
> >>> provide the better we are as a team. It can't all be one sided. I know
> there
> >>> have been a few that speak up from time to time and some that hold
> back.
> >>> This is your time to have your voice heard and make an impact on not
> just
> >>> our team but the entire WordPress project because of this.
> >>>
> >>> What other things do you want to add to the list of criteria?
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140828/bf2c3fd9/attachment-0001.html>