[theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting

[Daniel Fenn]

unicorns?
Regards,
Daniel Fenn






On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Philip Arthur Moore
<philip at pressbuild.com> wrote:
> If you find a completely neutral, unbiased, amazing theme reviewer
> good enough for WordPress.org who does not own a theme shop or make
> themes that would in any way "conflict" with WordPress.org, let me
> know. I've been looking for unicorns.
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I guess stepping stone in figurative pyramid comment gave me wrong idea.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's my take on (and original intent for proposing) the role of "trusted
>>> reviewer": they are reviewers who are experienced enough, and who perform
>>> thorough and complete enough reviews, to be *trusted* to push approved
>>> themes Live - either directly (in the case of their own tickets) or
>>> indirectly (in the case of the admin review queue.
>>>
>>> No more, no less. Not a "path to admin", not a title or recognition. Just
>>> those competent to push themes live.
>>>
>>> It's also not a status symbol or exclusive club. As far as I'm concerned,
>>> it should be something available to every single reviewer.
>>>
>>> The whole point is to facilitate the review process while ensuring that
>>> themes with critical issues don't end up in end users' hands.
>>>
>>> On Aug 28, 2014 5:38 PM, "Jose Castaneda" <jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As some of you are aware, and even attended, our meeting on tuesday went
>>>> good. If you would like to read the logs:
>>>> https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-themes&day=2014-08-26&sort=asc#m106404
>>>>
>>>> The basis of the meeting was to define the role of a key/trusted
>>>> reviewer. That person will have the ability to push themes live but not the
>>>> ability to assign tickets, sort of a sub-admin type of role. As Cais
>>>> mentioned the key things the admins are looking for are:
>>>>
>>>> * experience
>>>> * community involvement
>>>> * high quality reviews
>>>>
>>>> He also notes that he, and the other admins, would love more feedback.
>>>> Seriously, I cannot emphasize that part enough, folks. The more feedback we
>>>> provide the better we are as a team. It can't all be one sided. I know there
>>>> have been a few that speak up from time to time and some that hold back.
>>>> This is your time to have your voice heard and make an impact on not just
>>>> our team but the entire WordPress project because of this.
>>>>
>>>> What other things do you want to add to the list of criteria?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers