[theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting

[Emil Uzelac]

@Jose, few days ago I sent you an e-mail asking that we don't use word
"trusted", but no response. :(

What is the use of trust if the person doesn't know what to do, or heavily
relies on others, not too mention that some people will get offended if not
chosen for this role. "What, I am not trusted enough?" type of thing.

Not sure about others, I personally have received e-mail's from people
asking if they are trusted or not, this is the position I don't want to
find myself in.

Anyways, the only criteria I am interested in is that this person needs to
have good eye and solid review experience.

Trust comes with the job description and anyone that compromises its
position will loose the ability to push live.

Being a theme shop owner should not be an issue. This is an open source
community where we all participate equally :)








On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the implication you're making is that if someone who had themes in
> the repo was made an admin that they'd give themselves special treatment?
>
> Half the current admins already have themes in the repo and make money
> from WordPress related projects in one way or another already.
>
> I think it would be the same as it ever was, anyone, reviewers or admins
> should never have any involvement with tickets for their own work. And if
> caught doing so, banned.
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140828/f9cb6fb6/attachment-0001.html>