[theme-reviewers] Incorrect license on sites TOS

[Chip Bennett]

I would, yes. I consider anything related to licensing, theme name, credit
links, and upsell Themes to be show-stoppers.

(Though, in this case, the issue is a minor technicality between Apache 2.0
compatibility with GPLv2 vs GPLv3. I would maybe note the issue, ask it to
be fixed, and then proceed with the review.)


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Rohit Tripathi <rohitink at live.com> wrote:

> I am reviewing a lite version of a theme which is built on bootstrap, as
> we know bootstrap is based on apache 2.0 license, and compatible with GPL
> v3. The Terms of service of the AuthorURI says that the theme is under the
> GPL v2 license.
>
> So, should I ask the user to change the license detail on their TOS page,
> before i begin the review?
>
> Another theme, for themes using Incorrect ThemeURI's, should i first ask
> the author to fix the issue before reviewing the theme, or it can be
> reported alltogether with other issues found in the theme?
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20131031/1339b8c0/attachment.html>