[theme-reviewers] theme update tickets queue keep too long

Wed Oct 9 20:54:52 UTC 2013

I think what Chip is considering is that there will be 4 slots now, 3
existing and 1 new for #1.

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Zulfikar Nore <zulfikarnore at live.com>wrote:

> I'd say if the person that has the most reviews in the incentive scheme
> happens to also be the one with the most in priority #1 then they get 2
> nominations. If that is not the case they fall in say second place and get
> 1 nomination.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:16:30 +0530
>
> From: tskk79 at gmail.com
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] theme update tickets queue keep too long
>
> even better, as usual miles ahead of the rest :)
> but can you reconsider the only one featured theme per reviewer rule.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
> I actually would rather move toward a system where Priority #1 tickets get
> mass-marked as live upon approval, regardless of who reviews them. That
> would be my ideal system.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Chip, is it possible to give some old & regular reviewers ability
> to push only #1 tickets live? If so it will reduce burden on admins. Its
> probably asking too much.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
> I'm tossing around in my head the idea of a Priority #1 incentive, perhaps
> having the one (1) top monthly reviewer get to select a "Featured" Theme.
> But I need to think about it some more. There are some unintended
> consequences we need to avoid.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Zulfikar Nore <zulfikarnore at live.com>wrote:
>
> OK, just noticed that I've been mentioned twice so let me chime in on this
> one.
>
> Priority #1 - Good to know is for everyone but that's not the reason I
> don't review those ticket. For me its not challenging enough to skim and
> hit approved.
>
> Having said that, I think this should be changed and all priority #1
> tickets should be put through a thorough re-review i.e check what has been
> added, omitted and/or changed - do they meet requirements? Do they work (if
> additions) as they should? No newly introduced errors (warning, notices and
> the likes)?
>
> This would require downloading the theme, unzipping and checking the code
> (especially when its not possible to check via SVN diff system), Install
> and test then either approve or don't approve.
>
> So, yes to thorough review but no to include priority #1 as part of the
> count for the incentive program - Why? Because the hard work has already
> been done by the original reviewer and credit for it give. If however the
> theme is not approved upon this review then the subsequent submission will
> fall under priority #3 and the next review would be entitle to be credited
> with a count on their approved themes.
>
> Now that I have it confirmed and I'm allowed to venture in the #1 Que,
> here I come :) - I'll aim to do 1 from each Que at any given time when I
> have a free moment.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:59:45 +0530
> From: tskk79 at gmail.com
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] theme update tickets queue keep too long
>
> Yes, unfortunately that can happen,
> Regular reviewers who have themeshops wouldn't do that tough :)
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
> That's an idea. However, Priority #1 tickets get less scrutiny, and I fear
> that they would be skimmed too lightly in the name of gaming the system.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ulrich Pogson <grapplerulrich at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Could we not include priority one some how? Could you check at the end of
> the month how many of the priority 1 the winners have done or the top 5?
>
> I spent a month working on the prio 1 just to realize they were not
> included.
> On 9 Oct 2013 21:12, "Chip Bennett" <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>
> There's no easy way to track that.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 7 priority #1 = 1 priority #2/3/4
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
> That would skew the numbers too much.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> add it to the incentive program :)
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>
> you are right, I think that in past couple of weeks #1 priority is not
> prioritized
> and it should be :)
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Oven Zen <zenoven at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Emil, I mean too long is because at the time I send the first mail
> there are many tickets(about 30+ and there were  tickets not resolved for
> 4weeks) in the theme update queue while the same time new theme queue is
> much shorter. And I think this may against the priority of each queue.
>
> I really appreciate all reviewers work and that's why WordPress stronger.
> I will make more themes for free to the directory and I also hope to be a
> reviewer in the team somedays.But for now it just takes me too much time to
> think and write in English(this mail takes over 30 minutes) and this is
> really bad.
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers mailing
> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers mailing
> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20131010/c10f895a/attachment.html>