[theme-reviewers] Featured Themes

[Emil Uzelac]

Program works well and we don't need to change anything at this point :)


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Jasper Kips <jasper at planetkips.nl> wrote:

> Well, do it oldschool. You know pre facebook, with: +1
>
> Jasper Kips,
> Always waiting for the ricochet
>
> Op 9 okt. 2013 om 17:34 heeft Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> This mailing list should have a 'Like' feature :)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 09.10.2013, at 18:00, manish gori <manish_gori at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Themes are getting reviewed fast now...May be you are not aware of the old
> slow days..Reviewers are very well deserved to feature them..
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:18:55 -0400
> From: chip at chipbennett.net
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Featured Themes
>
> Why should the top three Reviewers not be allowed to select their own
> Theme to be featured?
>
> Only three of the 12-15 "featured" Themes are selected by Reviewers. Thus
> far, the incentive program has been wildly successful: the review queue has
> been slashed, ticket turnaround time has been slashed, more Themes are
> completing the review process, more approved Themes are available in the
> directory, Reviewers get a modicum of incentive for a very rigorous,
> all-volunteer activity, and the "Featured" Themes list rotation increases.
>
> I see absolutely nothing at all unfair with the review incentive program,
> or with allowing the top three monthly Reviewers to select their own Themes
> to be featured.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Charlie Livingston <
> kingbluebeard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  May I make a suggestion? That theme reviewers should not be able to
> choose their own themes to be featured, as this is unfair to all the theme
> authors who aren't reviewers/don't have the time to review as many themes.
> Thanks,
> Charlie
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers mailing
> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20131009/1835e29a/attachment.html>