[theme-reviewers] excerpt styling

priyanshu mittal priyanshu.mittal at gmail.com
Tue Mar 5 20:23:15 UTC 2013 

Hey please help me

How can we remove paragraph tags from excerpt i m only want the text of
excerpt  how can i do this?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:55 PM, <theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
> wrote:

> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>         theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Queue Push Update (Otto)
>    2. Re: Denied From Commercial List (Otto)
>    3. Re: Drop-in code library and public namespace (Slobodan Manic)
>    4. Re: Plugin dependencies (misunderstanding) (hal-android)
>    5. Re: Drop-in code library and public namespace (Chip Bennett)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 07:50:08 -0600
> From: Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Queue Push Update
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Message-ID:
>         <CAD-Fghw=
> Msscn_SKxeWxXVmC2pGOvuW3gv2Gj8D0eQXRn49qBA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> It is indeed case-sensitive, however his username really is "Shelob9",
> with the capital S.
>
> I suggest that you clear cookies and make sure you log in with the
> capital letters.
>
> -Otto
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Sorry. Works now. I will do an extra theme review as penance.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The name is case-sensitive. Last time, you said "Shelob9". :)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Still doesn't work. Can someone verify that I got added to  the reviews
> >>> group? My username is shelob9
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Modify ticket should work, try logging out and log back in once.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but hwo do I assign myself a
> >>>>> theme? I thought I could do it from modify ticket, but when I tried
> this on
> >>>>> an unassigned theme the only option available is "leave as new".
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Josh Pollock <jpollock412 at gmail.com
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks Chip!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You're added to the "reviewers" group now. Feel free to
> assign/close
> >>>>>>> tickets yourself. :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Josh Pollock <
> jpollock412 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I reviewed 1 theme twice (he resubmitted after my original
> >>>>>>>> recommendation and the default widget debate.) The second ticket
> is #1139
> >>>>>>>> (http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/11399), which I
> recommended be
> >>>>>>>> approved but is still open.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My username is Shelob9.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Chip Bennett <
> chip at chipbennett.net>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You're welcome to do as many as you would like or are able to do.
> >>>>>>>>> :) How many have you done now, and what's your username?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Josh Pollock
> >>>>>>>>> <jpollock412 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I know that I'm still an egg, but I could commit to doing 2 this
> >>>>>>>>>> week if you feel that I'm ready for that at this stage in my
> training.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Chip Bennett
> >>>>>>>>>> <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We're down to only 14 tickets older than 2 weeks:
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/report/3
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Anyone available to wipe out the Priority #2 queue?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Overall, we're down to 76 total tickets waiting to be reviewed,
> >>>>>>>>>>> with 217 tickets closed in the past 7 days:
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nice work so far, everyone!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Chip
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:09:39 -0600
> From: Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Denied From Commercial List
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAD-Fghz951fMOmUSo1q9jOH7hmiCMg2a0-hO2jrp6fx8zQnkGg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
> > Just briefly catching up with this thread. I think, at the very least, if
> > "have at least 3 Themes available" is an acceptance criterion, it should
> be
> > included in this list:
>
> The commercial listing is currently undergoing a revamp. You may
> notice that the list is smaller than it was before and many new sites
> got added (a bunch more got removed).
>
> Also, the "list" of criteria given on that page is not meant to be an
> exhaustive list, nor is it set in stone. It will change as time goes
> on.
>
> However, I do agree that a commercial vendor with only one theme does
> not qualify to be on that list. I would not set the limit of number of
> themes at any arbitrary point, such as "3", but clearly "1" is too
> few. Here's another unlisted criteria, for example: "You have to be an
> established theme vendor." Anybody could throw up a website and sell
> themes in a matter of about 30 minutes. Do they get on the list too?
>
> WordPress.org and the people working on it will decide the contents of
> that page using terms and criteria that we feel best helps out our
> user-base and gives an accurate portrayal of the state of commercial
> themes, as well as promotes the best theme-shops we can find. You're
> free to argue about the decisions all you like, but they will continue
> to be made using the criteria we feel are best.
>
> -Otto
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 17:19:04 +0100
> From: Slobodan Manic <slobodan.manic at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Drop-in code library and public
>         namespace
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Message-ID:
>         <CAN27JAkC5JCLibB5EGLgg0UKd=
> 310bB5bJU374ewoHrvh93a8Q at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Thanks to everyone who chimed in.
>
> I will definitely add notes on theme's usage of Customizer Boilerplate
> before submitting the updated version.
>
> Also, it's only function prefixes that are different and relevant. There's
> also an array of sample options in this file in Customizer
> Boilerplate<
> https://github.com/slobodan/WordPress-Theme-Customizer-Boilerplate/blob/master/customizer-boilerplate/options.php
> >,
> "using" 'my_theme_textdomain' translation string, but those are just sample
> options and are not meant to be translated, but simply overwriten in themes
> function.php file.
>
> ---
>
> Slobodan Manic
> WordPress developer at *ThematoSoup* <http://thematosoup.com/>
> Twitter: *@slobodanmanic* <https://twitter.com/#!/slobodanmanic>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > The premise behind the namespace guidelines are to help insure a few
> > things, one being theme uniqueness.
> > In this case, given the "drop-in" and the theme are by the same
> > author, the issue of namespace clashing should be moot.
> >
> > I would be able to accept this namespace difference, perhaps adding a
> > note to the theme's documentation explaining the difference /
> > relevance would be helpful.
> >
> > Also, as noted by @Daniel, this issue has already been addressed and
> > "drop-in" libraries are fine to use, especially since this one appears
> > to use a unique prefix as its namespace.
> >
> >
> > Edward Caissie
> > aka Cais.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Abhik Biswas <abhik at itsabhik.com> wrote:
> > > I must have missed that.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> That is not true. Frameworks are allowed to be used unaltered; that's
> he
> > >> whole point of using frameworks anyway. This has been discussed before
> > >> (several times) and has been deemed acceptable. See here:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2012/03/14/theme-frameworks-and-namespacing-guidelines/
> > >>
> > >> Daniel
> > >>
> > >> On Mar 5, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Abhik Biswas wrote:
> > >>
> > >> As long as I know, themes are *required* to use its name's slug as the
> > >> callback prefixes. Therefore,  if you are using a prefix that's not
> your
> > >> theme's name slug, might colide with other callbacks. Also, all the
> > callback
> > >> prefixes in a theme should be same and unique. You can not use
> different
> > >> prefixes in a single theme.
> > >>
> > >> A veteran reviwer can clarify it better than me.
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> > >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> > >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130305/2baa36ab/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 23:20:18 +0700
> From: hal-android <hasilent00 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Plugin dependencies (misunderstanding)
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Message-ID:
>         <CAJ3vVhPdf01aG0f=
> pw27521uByPppSoGZyYGd6imw-NgPtOAog at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> @Chipbennet
> Thank you very much, for the answer.
> I will review that theme right away.
>
> Best regards
> Hendro Prayitno
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:25:05 -0500
> From: Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Drop-in code library and public
>         namespace
> To: "[theme-reviewers]" <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAPdLKqevOEN-4KFRJ4LW-1BAjRQG+CyXPEcdXEv8ZqFimrd9hw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Right. We do need to use common sense here. :) If "placeholder" functions
> intended to be filtered is properly filtered, such that the actual
> namespacing used is correct, then there's no reason to fail the
> "placeholder" functions. (The propriety of such "placeholder" code is
> debatable, but IMHO outside of our scope.)
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Slobodan Manic <slobodan.manic at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Thanks to everyone who chimed in.
> >
> > I will definitely add notes on theme's usage of Customizer Boilerplate
> > before submitting the updated version.
> >
> > Also, it's only function prefixes that are different and relevant.
> There's
> > also an array of sample options in this file in Customizer Boilerplate<
> https://github.com/slobodan/WordPress-Theme-Customizer-Boilerplate/blob/master/customizer-boilerplate/options.php
> >,
> > "using" 'my_theme_textdomain' translation string, but those are just
> sample
> > options and are not meant to be translated, but simply overwriten in
> themes
> > function.php file.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Slobodan Manic
> > WordPress developer at *ThematoSoup* <http://thematosoup.com/>
> > Twitter: *@slobodanmanic* <https://twitter.com/#!/slobodanmanic>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> The premise behind the namespace guidelines are to help insure a few
> >> things, one being theme uniqueness.
> >> In this case, given the "drop-in" and the theme are by the same
> >> author, the issue of namespace clashing should be moot.
> >>
> >> I would be able to accept this namespace difference, perhaps adding a
> >> note to the theme's documentation explaining the difference /
> >> relevance would be helpful.
> >>
> >> Also, as noted by @Daniel, this issue has already been addressed and
> >> "drop-in" libraries are fine to use, especially since this one appears
> >> to use a unique prefix as its namespace.
> >>
> >>
> >> Edward Caissie
> >> aka Cais.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Abhik Biswas <abhik at itsabhik.com>
> wrote:
> >> > I must have missed that.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Tara <contact at onedesigns.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> That is not true. Frameworks are allowed to be used unaltered; that's
> >> he
> >> >> whole point of using frameworks anyway. This has been discussed
> before
> >> >> (several times) and has been deemed acceptable. See here:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2012/03/14/theme-frameworks-and-namespacing-guidelines/
> >> >>
> >> >> Daniel
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mar 5, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Abhik Biswas wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> As long as I know, themes are *required* to use its name's slug as
> the
> >> >> callback prefixes. Therefore,  if you are using a prefix that's not
> >> your
> >> >> theme's name slug, might colide with other callbacks. Also, all the
> >> callback
> >> >> prefixes in a theme should be same and unique. You can not use
> >> different
> >> >> prefixes in a single theme.
> >> >>
> >> >> A veteran reviwer can clarify it better than me.
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >>
> >> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130305/ae5c5dd3/attachment.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 34, Issue 84
> ***********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20130306/2e45c46e/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list